Using spoken attributions to classify abusive families

Despite claims that beliefs held by abusive parents are important indicators of family functioning, few studies have explored the relationship between patterns of beliefs and severity of abuse. This study applies findings from marital research that demonstrate that maladaptive attributional patterns predict the level of distress experienced in adult relationships. It examines spoken attributions produced by 18 families during diagnostic therapy sessions following serious abuse of a child. Attributions were identified from transcripts and coded using a standard system. Patterns of attributions, defined on the basis of previous work, successfully predicted classification of families by therapists as Good, Uncertain, and Poor, in terms of prognosis for rehabilitation. Using this classification to test hypotheses based on attributional style, group differences were found. In families rated Good, parents were more likely to attribute more control to self than child for negative outcomes. They were also more likely to nominate themselves as causing negative events. Case accounts of families from each category are presented to illustrate how attributional analysis can contribute to an understanding of the individual nature of child abuse.