Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How dangerous is low level radiation?

B L Cohen1

  • 1University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA.

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to: Impact of disclosure of radiographic test results on quality of life among patients with hernias: a randomized controlled trial.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2024
Same author

Impact of disclosure of radiographic test results on quality of life among patients with hernias: a randomized controlled trial.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2023
Same author

Review article: the intersection of mucosal pathophysiology in HIV and inflammatory bowel disease, and its implications for therapy.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2014
Same author

Fatigue is highly associated with poor health-related quality of life, disability and depression in newly-diagnosed patients with inflammatory bowel disease, independent of disease activity.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2014
Same author

Toward a contemporary tradition for menarche.

Journal of youth and adolescence·2013
Same author

The Van Pelt reassessment of our lung cancer vs. radon study.

Health physics·2004

The linear-no threshold theory likely overestimates low-level radiation risks. Even if valid, public fear of low-level radiation exposure is often exaggerated, particularly concerning radon and lung cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation carcinogenesis
  • Risk assessment
  • Public health

Background:

  • The linear-no threshold (LNT) model is a cornerstone of radiation risk assessment.
  • Concerns exist regarding the LNT model's applicability at low radiation doses.
  • Public perception of low-level radiation risks may be disproportionate to scientific evidence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review theoretical problems with the LNT model in radiation carcinogenesis.
  • To assess the LNT model's accuracy in estimating low-level radiation risks.
  • To evaluate the public's fear of low-level radiation in specific contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical review of the LNT model's basis in radiation carcinogenesis.
  • Direct empirical testing of the LNT model using radon-induced lung cancer data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of estimated risks versus public perception.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant theoretical issues suggest the LNT model overestimates low-level radiation risks.
    • Radon-lung cancer data provides strong empirical support for LNT overestimation.
    • Public anxiety regarding low-level radiation exposure appears exaggerated, even if the LNT model holds true.

    Conclusions:

    • The LNT model's validity at low doses is questionable, likely leading to overestimated risks.
    • Low-level radiation, including radon exposure, may pose less risk than commonly perceived.
    • Addressing public perception is crucial for accurate communication of radiation risks.