Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pattern visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis

J A Zeese

    Archives of Neurology
    |May 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study found that visual evoked response testing can detect abnormalities in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, even those without optic neuritis symptoms. This method helps identify silent visual pathway damage in suspected MS cases.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Recurrent acute toxic optic neuropathy secondary to 5-FU.

    Cancer treatment reports·1984
    Same author

    Brainstem auditory evoked responses in progressive supranuclear palsy.

    Annals of neurology·1979
    Same author

    Paroxysmal atrial tachycardia.

    Archives of neurology·1979
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Ophthalmology
    • Neurology

    Background:

    • Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease affecting the central nervous system.
    • Visual pathway involvement is common in MS, often leading to optic neuritis.
    • Early detection of MS lesions is crucial for timely intervention and management.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the utility of visual evoked response (VER) testing in detecting subclinical visual pathway lesions in multiple sclerosis patients.
    • To compare VER latencies in MS patients with those of normal subjects and patients with other neurological diseases.

    Main Methods:

    • Pattern reversal visual evoked responses were recorded from a midoccipital electrode for each eye.
    • Latency of the first major positive component was measured in 30 patients diagnosed with MS.
    • Latencies were compared against a control group of 18 healthy subjects and 18 patients with other neurological diseases.

    Main Results:

    • 77% of MS patients with measurable responses showed latencies outside the normal range.
    • 75% of MS patients without a history or findings of optic neuritis had abnormal VER responses.
    • Abnormalities were detected even in the absence of clinically apparent optic nerve involvement.

    Conclusions:

    • Visual evoked response testing is a sensitive tool for detecting asymptomatic lesions in the visual pathways of MS patients.
    • This electrophysiological method can aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple sclerosis.
    • VER testing is valuable for identifying individuals with suspected MS who may have subclinical visual system damage.

    Related Experiment Videos