Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Auditory speech processing in the left temporal lobe: an electrical interference study

D Boatman1, R P Lesser, B Gordon

  • 1Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287-7222, USA.

Brain and Language
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tau positron emission tomography imaging in C9orf72 repeat expansion carriers.

European journal of neurology·2019
Same author

Hearing threshold shifts among military pilots of the Israeli Air Force.

Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps·2017
Same author

Effects of lipoprotein apheresis on PCSK9 levels.

Atherosclerosis. Supplements·2015
Same author

Sex differences in the association between body mass index and hypertension - a cross-sectional study in 717 812 adolescents.

Pediatric obesity·2015
Same author

A strategy to reduce donor-specific HLA Abs before allogeneic transplantation.

Bone marrow transplantation·2014
Same author

Neuropsychology and advances in memory function.

Behavioural neurology·2014
Same journal

Measuring language proficiency in bilingual children using EEG-based neural tracking of continuous speech.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Inhibitory states modulate the processing of negated concepts in existential sentences. Evidence from ERPs" [Brain Lang. 105796].

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Evaluative processing of emotional and moral content during discourse comprehension: Insights from event-related brain potentials.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Reading-selective areas in the cerebellum in adult readers.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Effects of semantic distance and metaphorical constituent position on L2 noun-noun metaphor processing: an ERP study.

Brain and language·2026
Same journal

Cortical tracking of natural speech by children with developmental language disorder (DLD): An EEG speech decoding investigation.

Brain and language·2026
See all related articles

Direct cortical electrical interference revealed selective deficits in auditory speech processing within the posterior superior temporal lobes. Findings suggest bidirectional processing models for auditory comprehension and identification.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Speech Processing

Background:

  • Auditory speech processing involves distinct functions: discrimination, identification, and comprehension.
  • Traditional models propose hierarchical processing of auditory information.
  • Understanding the neural basis of these functions is crucial for treating speech disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural correlates of auditory syllable discrimination, identification, and comprehension.
  • To examine the functional organization within the posterior superior temporal (PST) lobes.
  • To test predictions of hierarchical versus bidirectional processing models.

Main Methods:

  • Direct cortical electrical interference was applied to three patients with subdural electrode arrays.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Patients performed auditory syllable tasks under conditions of electrical interference and no interference.
  • Performance deficits were analyzed based on the location and extent of electrical stimulation.
  • Main Results:

    • Electrical interference in PST lobes selectively impaired auditory speech functions.
    • Specific sites showed isolated comprehension deficits, while others impaired comprehension and identification.
    • Discrimination errors indicated influence from higher-level lexical-semantic and phonological processes.

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory speech functions can be selectively impaired, supporting some aspects of hierarchical models.
    • Evidence of higher-level influence on discrimination errors suggests bidirectional processing.
    • A bidirectional model with differentially weighted connections best explains the observed data.