Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

MR imaging versus alternative imaging techniques

J Hodler1, J S Yu, H C Steinert

  • 1University of Zurich, Balgrist Clinic, Switzerland.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

MR arthrography of the hip: improved imaging of the acetabular labrum with histologic correlation in cadavers.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·1995
Same author

Assessment of articular cartilage thickness of the humeral head: MR-anatomic correlation in cadavers.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·1995
Same author

Desmoplastic fibroma of the calcaneus.

Skeletal radiology·1995
Same author

Distribution of calcification in the triangular fibrocartilage region in 181 patients with calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystal deposition disease.

Radiology·1995
Same author

Melorheostosis with an ossified soft tissue mass: MR features.

Skeletal radiology·1995
Same author

Denervation hypertrophy of muscle: MR features.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·1995
Same journal

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Innovation, Integration, and Clinical Impact.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Advances and Innovations in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Future of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Navigating Ultra-High and Low-Field Imaging (Part 2).

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardiac MR Imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Climate Change and Globally Sustainable Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Strain Imaging in Heart Failure.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has limitations including cost, availability, and contraindications. Alternative imaging methods like sonography and CT are often more suitable for specific soft-tissue evaluations and screening.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a primary tool for soft-tissue abnormalities.
  • However, MR imaging presents several drawbacks impacting its widespread applicability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the limitations of MR imaging.
  • To identify alternative imaging modalities suitable for specific clinical scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of MR imaging with alternative modalities (sonography, CT, radiography, scintigraphy).
  • Consideration of factors such as cost, availability, contraindications, artifact susceptibility, and diagnostic specificity.

Main Results:

  • MR imaging is expensive and may have scheduling/access issues, favoring sonography.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Contraindications (e.g., biomedical implants) and patient factors (e.g., children) may necessitate sonography or CT.
  • MR imaging lacks specificity for tumors/infections compared to scintigraphy in some cases.
  • Radiography and CT excel in evaluating calcification and cortical bone abnormalities.

    • Conclusions:

    • Alternative imaging methods should be considered for soft-tissue evaluation, especially for screening purposes.
    • Sonography, CT, and radiography offer advantages over MR imaging in specific clinical contexts.
    • The choice of imaging modality should be tailored to the clinical indication, patient factors, and cost-effectiveness.