Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Benign and malignant masses. MR imaging differentiation

P T Weatherall1

  • 1University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cardiac atrophy after bed rest and spaceflight.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2001
Same author

MRI vs. histologic measurement of breast cancer following chemotherapy: comparison with x-ray mammography and palpation.

Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI·2001
Same author

Phenotypic heterogeneity in patients with familial partial lipodystrophy (dunnigan variety) related to the site of missense mutations in lamin a/c gene.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2001
Same author

Practical considerations in the imaging of soft tissue tumors.

The Orthopedic clinics of North America·1998
Same author

Musculotendinous injury.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·1995
Same author

Radiographic diagnosis of breast implant rupture: current status and comparison of techniques.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1995
Same journal

Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: Innovation, Integration, and Clinical Impact.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Advances and Innovations in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

The Future of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance: Navigating Ultra-High and Low-Field Imaging (Part 2).

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Cardiac MR Imaging.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Climate Change and Globally Sustainable Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Strain Imaging in Heart Failure.

Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging offers high sensitivity and detailed feature definition for musculoskeletal soft-tissue lesions. Analyzing lesion attributes, location, growth patterns, and MR signal characteristics aids in distinguishing benign from malignant conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Musculoskeletal Imaging
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Musculoskeletal soft-tissue lesions require accurate characterization for appropriate management.
  • Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging is a primary modality for evaluating soft-tissue abnormalities due to its sensitivity and detailed visualization.
  • Differentiating benign from malignant soft-tissue lesions is crucial for patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the utility of MR imaging in assessing musculoskeletal soft-tissue lesions.
  • To outline a systematic approach for lesion characterization using MR imaging features.
  • To emphasize the role of comprehensive analysis in differentiating benign and malignant processes.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive evaluation of lesion attributes on MR imaging.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of architectural details, lesion location, and growth patterns.
  • Assessment of specific MR signal characteristics and contrast enhancement patterns.

    • Main Results:

    • MR imaging demonstrates maximal sensitivity for detecting musculoskeletal soft-tissue lesions.
    • Detailed feature definition by MR imaging aids in lesion categorization.
    • Combining multiple MR imaging parameters significantly narrows the differential diagnosis.

    Conclusions:

    • MR imaging is highly effective for characterizing musculoskeletal soft-tissue lesions.
    • A systematic approach integrating architectural, locational, and signal characteristics improves diagnostic accuracy.
    • While pathognomonic findings are rare, MR imaging provides a high degree of confidence in differentiating benign and malignant lesions.