Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cryopreservation: the problem of evaluation

H W Jones1, L L Veeck, S J Muasher

  • 1Jones Institute for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, USA.

Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
|August 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diabetes Cured by Skim-milk.

The Chicago medical journal and examiner·2023
Same author

Public Hygiene and Legal Medicine: November, 1860.

Chicago medical examiner·2023
Same author

Observations on the Therapeutic Action of the Oxalate of Cerium in the Vomiting of Pregnancy.

The Chicago medical journal·2023
Same author

Retroversion of the Uterus, with a Description of an Instrument Designed for Its Reposition.

The Chicago medical journal·2023
Same author

Applications of automation in cervical cancer screening.

Journal of lower genital tract disease·2015
Same author

The future of set (single embryo transfer) in the United States.

Facts, views & vision in ObGyn·2014

Developing a pregnancy rate formula for cryopreserved material is crucial. This study introduces nine formulas, concluding that a comprehensive evaluation requires five distinct equations for assessing cryopreservation

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Cryobiology
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Accurate evaluation of cryopreservation techniques is essential for reproductive technologies.
  • Existing methods for assessing pregnancy rates with cryopreserved materials are insufficient.
  • A unified approach is needed to evaluate cryopreservation's impact on reproductive potential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe and evaluate various formulas for assessing pregnancy rates using cryopreserved materials.
  • To determine the most effective method for evaluating cryopreservation efficacy.
  • To highlight the limitations of current evaluatory formulas in reproductive science.

Main Methods:

  • Review and description of nine distinct formulas for cryopreservation evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of each formula's ability to assess cryotechnology's role in reproductive potential.
  • Comparative assessment of the comprehensiveness of different evaluatory approaches.

    • Main Results:

    • Nine separate formulas for evaluating cryopreservation were presented.
    • No single existing formula adequately expresses the total potential of cryopreservation.
    • A comprehensive evaluation necessitates the use of five specific equations.

    Conclusions:

    • Current formulas alone do not fully capture cryopreservation's potential.
    • Each formula offers partial insights into cryopreservation's role.
    • A multi-faceted approach using five distinct equations provides the most thorough evaluation of cryopreservation in reproductive cycles.