Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Simple indicators of physical working capacity

P Hassmén1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Sweden.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|October 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Determinants of adherence to lifestyle intervention in adults with obesity: a systematic review.

Clinical obesity·2017
Same author

Behavioural treatment strategies improve adherence to lifestyle intervention programmes in adults with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Clinical obesity·2017
Same author

Cardiac deceleration in elite golfers as modified by noise and anxiety during putting.

Perceptual and motor skills·2001
Same author

Training practices and overtraining syndrome in Swedish age-group athletes.

International journal of sports medicine·2001
Same author

Stress fractures of the tibia: can personality traits help us detect the injury-prone athlete?

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2001
Same author

Physical exercise and psychological well-being: a population study in Finland.

Preventive medicine·2000

Field tests for physical working capacity offer a cost-effective alternative to lab equipment. Submaximal walking and running tests show high correlations with laboratory methods, suggesting their utility for monitoring training progress.

Area of Science:

  • Exercise Physiology
  • Sports Science
  • Physical Rehabilitation

Background:

  • Traditional physical working capacity (PWC) assessments rely on expensive laboratory equipment like treadmills and cycle ergometers.
  • Field tests are sought as accessible alternatives, but often require maximal subject effort.
  • Submaximal field tests are desirable for ease of use and repeated measurements, such as monitoring training progress.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the validity of two submaximal field tests (walking and running) against standard laboratory tests (treadmill and cycle ergometer).
  • To assess the potential of field tests to complement or replace laboratory PWC assessments.
  • To determine the suitability of field tests for monitoring training adaptations over time.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two submaximal field tests: a walking test and a running test.
  • Comparison against two laboratory-based tests: a treadmill run test and a cycle ergometer test.
  • Statistical analysis of correlations between field and laboratory test results.

    • Main Results:

    • High and statistically significant correlations were observed between field tests and laboratory tests.
    • Field running demonstrated higher correlations with laboratory tests compared to field walking, particularly at higher intensity levels.
    • Field walking provided a reasonably accurate estimate of PWC, especially when performed at sufficient intensity.

    Conclusions:

    • Submaximal field tests, particularly running, can effectively estimate physical working capacity and complement laboratory assessments.
    • Field walking is a viable and accessible option for PWC estimation, especially for populations such as the elderly or those in rehabilitation.
    • These field tests hold promise for practical applications like monitoring training progress without specialized equipment.