Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computer simulation of transposable element evolution: random template and strict master models

J E Clough1, J A Foster, M Barnett

  • 1Department of Computer Science, University of Idaho, Moscow 83844-1010, USA.

Journal of Molecular Evolution
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AmelHap: Leveraging drone whole-genome sequence data to create a honey bee HapMap.

Scientific data·2023
Same author

Therapist Reports of EBP Client Engagement Challenges in Sessions with Diverse Youth and Families in Community Mental Health Settings.

Child & youth care forum·2020
Same author

Jupiter's Mesoscale Waves Observed at 5 <i>μ</i>m by Ground-based Observations and <i>Juno</i> JIRAM.

The Astronomical journal·2018
Same author

Progression of retinal ganglion cell loss in multiple sclerosis is associated with new lesions in the optic radiations.

European journal of neurology·2017
Same author

Genome-wide association studies of placebo and duloxetine response in major depressive disorder.

The pharmacogenomics journal·2017
Same author

Gut Microbiome and Behavior: Focus on Neuroimmune Interactions.

International review of neurobiology·2016
Same journal

Deep Dive into Evolution: How Cetaceans Adapt Their Anticoagulant Genes for Underwater Survival.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Sensing Underwater: Diversifying Selection, Convergent Evolution and Inactivation in Sensory Receptors' Genes of Aquatic Mammals.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Synonymous Codons as Potential Contributors to Chromatin Stability and Gene Body Methylation in Plants.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Convergent Functional Genomic Evolution Underlying Repeated Freshwater Colonization in Cetaceans.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Conditions Enabling the Persistence of Cooperating Synthetase, Ligase, and Mutation-Inhibitor Catalytic Polymers.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
Same journal

Lineage-Specific Diversification of Nucleoporin Nup98 Genes in Ciliates and Its Evolutionary Implications for the Nuclear Dualism.

Journal of molecular evolution·2026
See all related articles

Computer simulations challenge the master template model for mammalian retrotransposon replication. Analysis of DNA sequences revealed distinct parameters for random versus strict master transposition models over 15 million years of evolution.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Evolutionary Genetics

Background:

  • Mammalian retrotransposons are proposed to replicate via a master template model, inferred from DNA sequence analysis.
  • Previous conclusions relied on phylogenetic tree topology, shared variants, element divergence, and pairwise difference distributions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the robustness of existing parameters in predicting retrotransposition models.
  • To compare the Random Template Model and the Strict Master Model using computer simulations.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a computer simulator for retrotransposition studies, allowing manipulation of mutation rates, transposition template, and rate.
  • Conducted computer simulations of extreme transposition models (Random Template and Strict Master).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed large sequence datasets simulating up to 15 million years of evolution.

    • Main Results:

    • Parameters previously used to predict transposition models showed marked differences between the two extreme models.
    • Simulations with large sample sizes and extended evolutionary timescales highlighted these distinctions.

    Conclusions:

    • The master template model's predictive parameters are not robust across different retrotransposition models.
    • Computer simulations provide a versatile platform for studying retrotransposition dynamics and evolutionary models.