Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Argon laser revision stapedectomy

K L Horn1, S G Gherini, D C Franz

  • 1Presbyterian Ear Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106, USA.

The American Journal of Otology
|May 1, 1994
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intracranial extension of acquired aural cholesteatoma.

The Laryngoscope·2000
Same author

Hear early: New Mexico's universal newborn hearing screening program.

Otolaryngologic clinics of North America·1999
Same author

Large vestibular aqueduct syndrome: an overlooked etiology for progressive childhood hearing loss.

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology·1998
Same author

Universal newborn hearing screening.

The American journal of otology·1997
Same author

The middle fossa transpetrous approach: experience with 13 cases.

Skull base surgery·1997
Same author

Craniometaphyseal dysplasia: operative findings and treatment.

The American journal of otology·1996

Argon laser revision stapedectomy in 32 patients showed significantly better clinical results than mechanical techniques. This safe and effective argon laser method is comparable to CO2 laser use for stapedectomy.

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgical Technology

Background:

  • Revision stapedectomy is a complex otologic procedure.
  • The safety of argon laser use in revision stapedectomy has been debated.
  • Previous studies have reported varying outcomes with different surgical techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the clinical outcomes of argon laser revision stapedectomy.
  • To compare the efficacy and safety of argon laser versus other techniques.
  • To assess the feasibility of using an argon laser with a fiberoptic handpiece.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 32 patients underwent argon laser revision stapedectomy.
  • The argon laser was delivered via a fiberoptic handpiece to the operative site.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Clinical results were analyzed and compared to historical data.

    • Main Results:

    • The argon laser technique yielded significantly better clinical results compared to mechanical methods.
    • Outcomes using the argon laser were comparable to those reported with CO2 laser.
    • The procedure was deemed safe and effective in this patient cohort.

    Conclusions:

    • Argon laser revision stapedectomy is a safe and effective surgical option.
    • This technique offers superior results compared to traditional mechanical approaches.
    • The use of argon laser with fiberoptic delivery is a viable advancement in stapedectomy surgery.