Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.3K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

11.1K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
11.1K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

9.1K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
9.1K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.9K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.9K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

10.3K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
10.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.8K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Docetaxel and nab-paclitaxel are safe alternative options for patients with gynecologic malignancies following hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel.

European journal of gynaecological oncology·2018
Same author

Use of hematologic biomarkers during chemotherapy predicts survival in ovarian cancer patients.

European journal of gynaecological oncology·2018
Same author

The CD47 "don't eat me signal" is highly expressed in human ovarian cancer.

Gynecologic oncology·2016
Same author

Evidence for a time-dependent association between FOLR1 expression and survival from ovarian carcinoma: implications for clinical testing. An Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis consortium study.

British journal of cancer·2014
Same author

Evaluation of the outcome benefit conferred by intensive surveillance strategies in women with early-stage endometrial cancer.

European journal of gynaecological oncology·2014
Same author

Adjuvant treatment for uterine leiomyosarcoma.

European journal of gynaecological oncology·2014

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 13, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K

Euclidean distance matrix analysis: confidence intervals for form and growth differences

S Lele1, J T Richtsmeier

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.

American Journal of Physical Anthropology
|September 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel method for calculating confidence intervals for biological form and growth differences. This statistical approach enhances the accuracy of morphological analyses in various scientific applications.

More Related Videos

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Longitudinal Measurement of Extracellular Matrix Rigidity in 3D Tumor Models Using Particle-tracking Microrheology
11:11

Longitudinal Measurement of Extracellular Matrix Rigidity in 3D Tumor Models Using Particle-tracking Microrheology

Published on: June 10, 2014

12.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 13, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.8K
Longitudinal Measurement of Extracellular Matrix Rigidity in 3D Tumor Models Using Particle-tracking Microrheology
11:11

Longitudinal Measurement of Extracellular Matrix Rigidity in 3D Tumor Models Using Particle-tracking Microrheology

Published on: June 10, 2014

12.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biometrics
  • Statistical Shape Analysis
  • Geometric Morphometrics

Background:

  • Analysis of biological forms using landmark data is a growing field.
  • Current statistical work focuses on estimating average form, form differences, and growth differences.
  • Estimates of scientific quantities require accuracy statements, typically provided by confidence intervals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a method for obtaining confidence intervals for estimators of form difference and growth difference.
  • To provide a statistically rigorous way to assess the accuracy of shape and growth difference analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizes Euclidean distance matrix analysis for form and growth difference estimation.
  • Employs the model-independent bootstrap method for calculating confidence intervals.
  • Applies the method to 2D and 3D craniofacial data from human patients and non-human primates (Cebus apella).

Main Results:

  • Demonstrates the successful application of the confidence interval method to real-world biological data.
  • Provides accuracy assessments for morphological differences between craniofacial patient and control groups.
  • Quantifies sexual dimorphism in craniofacial morphology and facial growth in Cebus apella.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method effectively generates confidence intervals for form and growth difference estimators.
  • This approach enhances the reliability and interpretability of findings in morphometric studies.
  • The technique is broadly applicable to various biological shape analysis problems.