Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Safety aspects in MR imaging]

J Abart1, A Ganssen

  • 1Bereich Medizinische Technik, Erlangen.

Aktuelle Radiologie
|November 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluates the health risks of Magnetic Resonance (MR) systems, detailing effects from static, alternating, and high-frequency fields. It provides essential safety information and exposure limits for patients and staff during MR procedures.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Peripheral nerve stimulation by time-varying magnetic fields.

Journal of computer assisted tomography·1997
Same author

[Depiction of evoked regional brain activity using magnetic resonance tomography].

Aktuelle Radiologie·1993
Same author

[Early clinical experience with nuclear magnetic resonance (author's transl)].

RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin·1981
Same author

[Thermographic control of the healing process after osteoplastic surgery of the maxillary sinus].

Osterreichische Zeitschrift fur Stomatologie·1981
Same author

[Nuclear magnetic resonance tomography].

Computertomographie·1981
Same author

Fast determination of water mobility in blood plasma -- investigation of clinical significance.

Biorheology·1979
Same journal

[Angiodysplasia in a jejunal diverticulum as an unusual cause of lower gastrointestinal bleeding].

Aktuelle Radiologie·1999
Same journal

[MRI diagnosis of a female urethral diverticulum].

Aktuelle Radiologie·1999
Same journal

[Benign solid and papillary epithelial tumors of the pancreas].

Aktuelle Radiologie·1999
Same journal

[Sensitivity differences of different emulsion numbers for different UV/blue-sensitive films].

Aktuelle Radiologie·1999
Same journal

[Clinical use of a new analytical method for the determination of bone density by means of quantitative computer tomography].

Aktuelle Radiologie·1999
Same journal

[Interventional methods in breast diagnosis. Histological vs. cytological evaluation of core cut biopsies of the breast].

Aktuelle Radiologie·1999
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Biophysics
  • Radiological Safety

Background:

  • Increasing use of Magnetic Resonance (MR) systems in clinical settings necessitates a thorough evaluation of safety aspects.
  • Understanding the potential risks and health effects associated with MR technology is crucial for both patients and healthcare professionals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the biological and health effects of electromagnetic fields used in Magnetic Resonance imaging.
  • To provide foundational information for the safe operation of diagnostic MR systems.
  • To present recommended exposure limits for magnetic fields and time-dependent electromagnetic field changes.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on the effects of static, alternating, and high-frequency fields on biological systems.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of existing data and personal experience regarding MR system interactions with the human body.
  • Compilation of safety guidelines and regulatory recommendations for MR exposure.

    • Main Results:

    • Detailed description of the effects of static, alternating, and high-frequency magnetic fields on biological systems, particularly the human organism.
    • Presentation of essential information for ensuring the safe operation of diagnostic MR systems.
    • Inclusion of suggested limits for patient and employee exposure to magnetic fields and time-varying electromagnetic fields.

    Conclusions:

    • Comprehensive understanding of MR electromagnetic field effects is vital for patient and staff safety.
    • Adherence to established safety protocols and exposure limits minimizes potential health risks associated with MR procedures.
    • This work serves as a resource for safe clinical implementation and operation of Magnetic Resonance imaging technology.