Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The object delayed non-matching to sample task in rats does not depend on working memory

A H Herremans1, T H Hijzen, J L Slangen

  • 1Department of Psychopharmacology, Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neurosciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.

Neuroreport
|October 23, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Concurrent Schedules: Effects of Blackout during the Changeover Delay.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Serotonergic drug effects on a delayed conditional discrimination task in the rat; involvement of the 5-HT1A receptor in working memory.

Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)·2012
Same author

SLV330, a cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist, attenuates ethanol and nicotine seeking and improves inhibitory response control in rats.

Behavioural brain research·2010
Same author

Male and female 5-HT(1B) receptor knockout mice have higher body weights than wildtypes.

Physiology & behavior·2002
Same author

Footshock-induced sensitization of the acoustic startle response in two strains of mice.

Behavioural brain research·2001
Same author

Absence of 5-HT(1B) receptors is associated with impaired impulse control in male 5-HT(1B) knockout mice.

Biological psychiatry·2001

Rats did not show working memory (WM) in a task where object position influenced choices. Performance depended on object discrimination, not memory, suggesting positional cues override cognitive processes.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Animal Behavior

Background:

  • Working memory (WM) is crucial for decision-making.
  • Object-based tasks are common for assessing WM in rodents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate working memory (WM) in rats using an object delayed non-matching to sample task.
  • To determine if rats utilize object discrimination or WM for task performance.

Main Methods:

  • Four rats were trained on a delayed non-matching to sample task.
  • Object placement order was manipulated (fixed, reversed, randomized) to assess its effect on performance.

Main Results:

  • Performance significantly dropped when object placement order was reversed.
  • Rats failed to learn the task when object order was randomized.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Results indicate a strong reliance on object position rather than memory.

    • Conclusions:

    • Rat performance in this task is likely based on object discrimination, not working memory (WM).
    • Positional cues significantly influence choice behavior, potentially confounding WM assessments.