Related Experiment Videos
Positioning post-outpatient cardiac catheterization
1Department of Medical Nursing, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Insights
Altering patient position after cardiac catheterization is safe and improves comfort. Patients preferred side-lying or head-elevated positions over traditional supine rest, reducing dissatisfaction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Patient Care
Background:
- Optimal patient positioning after outpatient cardiac catheterization remains under-researched.
- Traditional practice involves supine positioning with the head of the bed flat.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of three post-cardiac catheterization positions on complication rates.
- To assess patient satisfaction and comfort with different post-procedure positions.
Main Methods:
- Sixty-nine patients were randomized into three groups post-procedure.
- Group 1: Supine, head of bed (HOB) flat. Group 2: Side-lying, affected extremity straight. Group 3: Supine, HOB elevated 15-30 degrees.
- Complications and patient-reported preference for an alternative position were recorded.
Main Results:
- Complication rates were similar across groups (p=0.05).
- Significantly fewer patients in Group 1 (traditional supine) preferred an alternative position compared to Groups 2 and 3 (p < .001).
- 85% of Group 1 patients desired a different position versus 24% in Groups 2 & 3, indicating greater dissatisfaction.
Conclusions:
- Varying patient position post-cardiac catheterization is as safe as the traditional supine method.
- Alternative positions, such as side-lying or head elevation, enhance patient comfort and satisfaction.
Unlabelled:
The optimal positioning post-outpatient cardiac catheterization is a largely unexplored area of research. Traditionally, patients have been placed supine, with the head of the bed (HOB) flat. This study sought to explore the influence of three different post-procedure positions on the incidence of complications and patient perceptions of satisfaction. Sixty-nine patients were randomized into three groups immediately after hemostasis of the arterial puncture site was achieved. Group 1 patients were placed supine with the HOB flat. Group 2 patients were placed on their sides, with the affected extremity straight. Group 3 patients were placed on their backs, with the HOB at 15-30 degrees. Endpoints included the presence of any complication (bleeding, hematoma formation or expansion, back pain and urinary retention) and patient comfort and satisfaction with the randomized position. Patients were asked prior to discharge to select the position they would have preferred post-procedure. Selection of an alternative position was felt to indicate dissatisfaction with the randomized position. Ten patients in Group 1, and nine patients in Group 2 and Group 3 experienced a complication (X2 = 3.682, df = 1, p = 0.05). Eighty-five percent of Group 1 patients selected an alternative position vs. 24% of those patients in Group 2 and Group 3 (X2 = 27.6, df = 1, p < .001).
Conclusion:
varying patient position post-outpatient cardiac catheterization is at least as safe as the traditional supine position and is more comfortable for patients.