Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

How to Study Placebo Responses in Motion Sickness with a Rotation Chair Paradigm in Healthy Participants
Published on: December 14, 2014
The effects of motion direction, body axis, and posture on motion sickness induced by low frequency linear
J F Golding1, H M Markey, J R Stott
1DRA Centre for Human Sciences, Farnborough, Hants, UK.
Background:
A recent experiment demonstrated that low frequency linear oscillation through the Z-axis of the body was more nauseogenic when applied in the vertical direction, with subjects seated upright, than in the horizontal direction, with subjects supine.
Hypothesis:
The nauseogenicity of low frequency linear oscillatory motion is dependent on direction of motion with respect to the gravity vector, orientation of body axis with respect to motion, and body posture.
Methods:
The following conditions were compared: A) seated upright, with horizontal motion, X-axis; B) seated upright, with vertical motion, Z-axis; and C) supine, with vertical motion, X-axis. Sinusoidal motion at 0.35 Hz, 3.6 m.s-2 peak was used in all conditions. Two experiments were performed. In Experiment 1 subjects (n = 28) were exposed to conditions A and B. In Experiment 2 subjects (n = 12) were exposed to conditions A, B and C.
Results:
Horizontal motion (condition A) was found to be twice as nauseogenic (p < 0.05 to p < 0.0001) as vertical motion (condition B), but there was no difference in nauseogenicity between upright and supine postures for vertical motion (condition B vs. C). Mean motion exposure times to achieve moderate nausea were: Experiment 1: A) 9.0 min.; B) 22.4 min.; Experiment 2: A) 15.3 min.; B) 27.1 min.; C) 22.5 min.
Conclusions:
These results, taken together with those of the previous experiment, suggest that upright vs. supine body posture and stimulation through X- vs. Z-axis, both enhance the nauseogenicity of low frequency linear oscillation, these effects are additive, but that motion direction with respect to the gravity vector (horizontal vs. vertical) is a less important factor.
More Related Videos
06:18Assessing the Autonomic and Behavioral Effects of Passive Motion in Rats using Elevator Vertical Motion and Ferris-Wheel Rotation
Published on: February 7, 2020
07:24Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
Published on: August 22, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Simple Harmonic Motion
Equilibrium and Balance
Planar Rigid-Body Motion
Planar motion is typically divided into three distinct categories. The first is rectilinear translation, demonstrated by a subway train that moves along...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it instrumental in...
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration
Time differentiation is...