Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Continuous Manual Exchange Transfusion for Patients with Sickle Cell Disease: An Efficient Method to Avoid Iron Overload
Published on: March 14, 2017
Determinants of survival in pediatric continuous hemofiltration
W E Smoyer1, C McAdams, B S Kaplan
1Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine 19104, USA.
Insights
Continuous hemofiltration (CH) in critically ill children shows variable survival rates. Combined ultrafiltration and dialysis improved outcomes, while pressor support indicated poorer prognosis. Empirical anticoagulation is not necessary.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Intensive Care
- Nephrology
- Critical Care Medicine
Background:
- Continuous hemofiltration (CH) use is increasing in pediatric intensive care units.
- This study reviews 114 CH treatments in 98 critically ill children (1 day to 23 years).
- Common diagnoses included sepsis, ARDS, liver transplant, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, and HUS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the outcomes and survival rates of continuous hemofiltration in critically ill children.
- To identify factors influencing survival in pediatric patients undergoing CH.
- To assess the effectiveness of different CH modalities and anticoagulation strategies.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 114 CH treatments in 98 pediatric patients.
- Data collected on patient demographics, diagnoses, indications, CH methods (CAVH, CAVH-D, CVVH, CVVH-D), anticoagulation, treatment duration, and filter lifespan.
- Survival rates analyzed by diagnostic groups, need for pressors, and treatment modality.
Main Results:
- Overall survival rate was 43%, with significant variation among diagnostic groups (e.g., 100% for TTP/SLE, 0% for BMT).
- Survival was better in patients not requiring pressors (P < 0.005) and those treated with combined ultrafiltration and dialysis (P < 0.005).
- Filter lifespan was longer in arteriovenous vs. venovenous CH (P < 0.004); anticoagulation did not affect filter lifespan.
Conclusions:
- Empirical anticoagulation for CH in children is not essential.
- Children with specific underlying diseases and those needing pressor support have poorer survival despite effective CH.
- Adding countercurrent dialysis to CH may improve survival to hospital discharge.
Abstract:
Continuous hemofiltration (CH) is being used in increasing numbers of pediatric intensive care unit patients. Experience with 114 CH treatments in 98 critically ill children from March 1988 to March 1993 is presented in this study. Ages ranged from 1 day to 23 yr (mean +/- SE = 7.1 +/- 0.7 yr), and 54% of patients were male. Seventeen percent of all treatments were performed in neonates under 1 month of age. The most common primary diagnoses were sepsis and adult respiratory distress syndrome (11 patients each), liver transplantation and hypoplastic left heart syndrome (10 patients each), and hemolytic uremic syndrome (9 patients). The most frequent indications for CH were fluid overload and acute renal failure (42% each). Choices for CH included: continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration (CAVH, 50%), continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration (CAVH, 23%), continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH, 18%), and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVH-D, 9%). Choices for anticoagulation included: none (47%), regional (49%), and systemic (4%). Treatment duration ranged from 1 to 25 days (mean = 5.3 +/- 0.4 days). Mean filter life span for 363 filters was 0.94 +/- 0.1 filters/patient per day. Despite an overall survival rate of 43%, survival to discharge varied greatly (0 to 100%) among the 24 diagnostic groups: tumor lysis syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus (3/3 patients each, 100%), hemolytic uremic syndrome (8/9 patients, 89%). This compares with: bone marrow transplantation (0/6 patients, 0%), hypoplastic left heart syndrome (2/10 patients, 20%), and leukemia (1/4 patients, 25%). Survival to hospital discharge was better in patients who did not receive pressors (P < 0.005) and in patients treated with combined ultrafiltration and dialysis (CAVH-D, CVVH-D) compared with ultrafiltration alone (CAVH, CVVH) (P < 0.005), but was not notably affected by patient age, sex, use of anticoagulation, filter life span, blood pump-assisted versus spontaneous CH, or duration of therapy. Filter life span was not affected by use of anticoagulation, but was remarkably longer in patients with arteriovenous versus venovenous CH (P < 0.004). It was concluded that: (1) empirical anticoagulation of patients treated with CH is not necessary; (2) children with a minority of underlying diseases and those requiring pressor support at initiation of CH appear to have relatively poor survival rates despite the technically effective use of CH; and (3) the addition of countercurrent dialysis to routine CH may enhance patient survival to hospital discharge.
Related Concept Videos
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Steady-State, Minimum and Maximum Concentrations
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

