Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative study of intensive care unit (ICU) performance

J Livianu1, J M Orlando, E F Povoa

  • 1Hospital I.Albert Einstein, Hospital Municipal Dr. Arthur Ribeiro de Saboya Health Informatics Center, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Medinfo. MEDINFO
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Severity-of-illness scoring systems can assess intensive care unit (ICU) performance. A new software ensures objective data collection for APACHE II scores and hospital indicators, enabling reliable comparisons between different ICUs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Guidelines of Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia for Unstable Angina and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (II Edition, 2007) 2013-2014 Update].

Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia·2014
Same author

Guidelines for maintenance of adult patients with brain death and potential for multiple organ donations: the Task Force of the Brazilian Association of Intensive Medicine the Brazilian Association of Organs Transplantation, and the Transplantation Center of Santa Catarina.

Transplantation proceedings·2012
Same author

Classification of postural profiles among mouth-breathing children by learning vector quantization.

Methods of information in medicine·2010
Same author

Tight glucose control versus intermediate glucose control: a quasi-experimental study.

Anaesthesia and intensive care·2010
Same author

Double-lumen central venous catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine to prevent catheter colonisation in the intensive care unit setting: a prospective randomised study.

The Journal of hospital infection·2009
Same author

Security requirements for a lifelong electronic health record system: an opinion.

The open medical informatics journal·2009

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Clinical Informatics
  • Critical Care Medicine

Background:

  • Evaluating intensive care unit (ICU) performance is crucial for quality improvement.
  • Existing severity-of-illness systems may lack objectivity for inter-unit comparisons.
  • Standardized data collection is essential for reliable performance metrics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a software tool for objective ICU performance evaluation.
  • To assess the suitability of the APACHE II scoring system for comparing different ICUs.
  • To integrate administrative hospital indicators with clinical severity scores.

Main Methods:

  • A dedicated software was developed for automated data collection.
  • The APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) scoring system was implemented.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Administrative hospital indicators were collected alongside APACHE II data.
  • A single author verified all collected data for homogeneity and accuracy.
  • Main Results:

    • The developed software facilitates consistent data collection for APACHE II and hospital indicators.
    • Standardized data collection protocols enhance the homogeneity of performance metrics.
    • The system provides a basis for objective comparison of ICU performance across different units.
    • Data verification by a single author ensures reliability.

    Conclusions:

    • Objective evaluation of ICU performance is achievable with standardized data collection.
    • The developed software supports the reliable use of APACHE II and administrative data for comparative analysis.
    • This approach enhances the validity of ICU performance assessments and facilitates quality benchmarking.