Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validation of expert systems: examples and considerations

M M Ohayon1

  • 1Centre de Recherche, Institut Philippe Pinel de Montréal, 10905 boul. Henri-Bourassa est, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H1C 1H1.

Medinfo. MEDINFO
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence, incidence, evolution and associated factors of sleep paralysis in a longitudinal study of the US general population.

Sleep medicine·2022
Same author

Medical comorbidity in narcolepsy: findings from the Burden of Narcolepsy Disease (BOND) study.

Sleep medicine·2017
Same author

Prevalence and comorbidity of nocturnal wandering in the U.S. adult general population.

Neurology·2012
Same author

Frequency of narcolepsy symptoms and other sleep disorders in narcoleptic patients and their first-degree relatives.

Journal of sleep research·2005
Same author

[Daytime consequences of insomnia complaints in the French general population].

L'Encephale·2004
Same author

[Sleep and insomnia markers in the general population].

L'Encephale·2004

Validating medical expert systems is complex, requiring rigorous methods to prove practical competency. This paper outlines essential reflections and requirements for validating knowledge base systems, particularly in psychiatry.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • Psychiatric Knowledge Systems

Background:

  • Medical expert systems require rigorous validation for current clinical use.
  • Validation encompasses system conclusions, deductive processes, and utilization efficacy.
  • The complexity is particularly pronounced in specialized fields like psychiatry.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the challenges in validating medical expert systems.
  • To expose key reflections, questions, and requirements for system validation.
  • To focus on the specific needs for validating psychiatric knowledge base systems.

Main Methods:

  • The study presents a conceptual framework and discussion.
  • It involves critical analysis of validation methodologies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It highlights requirements for knowledge base system validation.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified critical factors for expert system validation.
    • Outlined specific considerations for psychiatric applications.
    • Emphasized the need for a robust validation methodology.

    Conclusions:

    • Validation of medical expert systems is a multifaceted challenge.
    • Rigorous validation is crucial for ensuring practical competency and safe utilization.
    • Specific requirements must be met for validating psychiatric expert systems.