Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 18, 2026

Creating Rigidly Stabilized Fractures for Assessing Intramembranous Ossification, Distraction Osteogenesis, or Healing of Critical Sized Defects
Published on: April 11, 2012
The reconstruction locked nail for complex fractures of the proximal femur
S Kang1, M P McAndrew, K D Johnson
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract:
Thirty-seven patients with 37 proximal femoral fractures were treated with a reconstruction locked femoral nail. There were four ipsilateral intracapsular femoral neck and shaft fractures, two intertrochanteric fractures, 18 intertrochanteric fractures with diaphyseal extension, eight subtrochanteric fractures with involvement of the lesser trochanter, and five subtrochanteric fractures without involvement of the lesser trochanter. The overall union rate was 92%. Twenty-one complications developed in 13 patients (35%) which included three of the four femoral neck and shaft fractures, and six of 18 intertrochanteric fractures with diaphyseal extension. Of the five intertrochanteric fractures with diaphyseal extension in which anatomic reduction was not achieved, four developed a complication. Of the nine proximal screws in nine fractures, which were placed short (below the subchondral bone of the femoral head), six fractures developed a complication. The complications included three nonunions, one delayed union, two leg-length discrepancies of > 2.5 cm, two cases of varus deformity of > 10 degrees, two varus deformities < 10 degrees, four instances of revision surgery including one broken 13-mm nail, four proximal screws that backed out and required removal, two cases of pudendal nerve palsy, and one case of heterotopic ossification. Seven patients developed more than one complication. Eleven of the 13 patients with complications required a second surgery to treat the complication. We conclude that the reconstruction locked femoral nail is not a good choice for ipsilateral intracapsular neck and shaft fractures. Our recommendation is that anatomic reduction should be achieved for all cases using the reconstruction femoral nail, but it is absolutely required when treating the intertrochanteric fracture with diaphyseal extension. Reconstruction femoral nails have a high rate of complication due to the complex nature of the fractures as well as the device.
More Related Videos
07:41An Intramedullary Locking Nail for Standardized Fixation of Femur Osteotomies to Analyze Normal and Defective Bone Healing in Mice
Published on: November 13, 2016
04:41Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025