Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can chemicals be loved?--A problem for 2000

C Berry1

  • 1Department of Morbid Anatomy, Royal London Hospital, London, UK.

Toxicology Letters
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Traditional left ventricular indices outperform novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived left atrial parameters in predicting adverse left ventricular remodelling after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

International journal of cardiology·2026
Same author

[Telemonitoring of digital flaps using the Pixacare tool: A prospective implementation study].

Annales de chirurgie plastique et esthetique·2025
Same author

Dissecting the heterogeneity of craniofacial lesions in patients with fibrous dysplasia/McCune-Albright Syndrome.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2024
Same author

Standards for clinical trials for treating TB.

The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease·2023
Same author

Microvascular arterial disease of the brain and the heart: a shared pathogenesis.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2023
Same author

Prevention and early treatment of the long-term physical effects of COVID-19 in adults: design of a randomised controlled trial of resistance exercise-CISCO-21.

Trials·2022
Same journal

LEF1 regulated CTHRC1 Promotes Silica-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis through CD44-Dependent Signaling.

Toxicology letters·2026
Same journal

hERG Channel Blockade and Additive Interactions of Magnolol and Honokiol from Magnolia Species.

Toxicology letters·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of dose-dependent hematotoxic effects of celastrol on human blood cells in vitro.

Toxicology letters·2026
Same journal

Environmental pharmaceutical and antibiotic mixtures: An exposomics-guided framework for mechanistic toxicology.

Toxicology letters·2026
Same journal

Size- and morphology-dependent cytotoxicity of metal-organic frameworks: Deciphering the structure-toxicity relationship.

Toxicology letters·2026
Same journal

Steroidogenesis suppression in H295R cells by 1,3-disubstituted ureas: A potential off-target effect of some sEH inhibitors.

Toxicology letters·2026
See all related articles

Public understanding of chemical benefits is often flawed, undervaluing their importance in daily life. Promoting rational debate and educating the public on toxicology, risk, and safety is crucial for accurate perception.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Toxicology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Public perception of chemicals is often based on incomplete or biased information.
  • Benefits of chemicals, such as in clean water and food, are frequently undervalued.
  • Societal changes in disease patterns are often misattributed to factors other than chemical interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for a more rational public discourse on the role of chemicals.
  • To inform the public and opinion leaders about key toxicological concepts like hazard, risk, and safety.
  • To address the misconception of mistaking association for causation in chemical-related issues.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of evolving scientific understanding in toxicology.
  • Analysis of how new toxicological insights can inform public debate.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identifying strategies to counter misinformation from single-issue groups.

    • Main Results:

    • Current public understanding of chemical value is often irrational and based on poor information.
    • There is a need to educate the public on the nuanced concepts of hazard, risk, and safety.
    • Advancements in toxicology provide a stronger foundation for evidence-based discussions.

    Conclusions:

    • A rational debate on chemicals requires addressing public misconceptions and providing accurate scientific information.
    • Educating the public on toxicology, risk assessment, and the difference between association and causation is essential.
    • Leveraging scientific advancements in toxicology can improve public perception and evaluation of chemicals in daily life.