Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is liability possible for forensic psychiatrists?

R Weinstock1, T Garrick

  • 1West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, CA 90073, USA.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigation of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status scores in an Australian community sample of brain donors with schizophrenia.

Acta neuropsychiatrica·2016
Same author

NISAD's 'Gift of Hope' Brain Donor Program: a postmortem brain donor program for people with schizophrenia and allied disorders and those without mental illness.

Acta neuropsychiatrica·2016
Same author

Clinical characterization of brain tissue for neuroscience research: a comparison of antemortem and postmortem diagnoses.

Acta neuropsychiatrica·2016
Same author

'Gift of Hope' - motivation for brain donation into schizophrenia research.

Acta neuropsychiatrica·2016
Same author

An Australian Brain Bank: a critical investment with a high return!

Cell and tissue banking·2008
Same author

Ultrasound-detected thyroid nodule prevalence and radiation dose from fallout.

Radiation research·2008

Forensic psychiatrists face lower liability risks due to immunity and lack of a direct patient relationship. A proposed model clarifies duties, potentially improving malpractice insurance coverage for forensic psychiatrists.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Legal Medicine
  • Medical Malpractice

Background:

  • Forensic psychiatrists operate in a unique legal and ethical landscape.
  • Traditional malpractice claims require a physician-patient relationship, often absent in forensic evaluations.
  • Existing legal protections, including judicial and quasi-judicial immunity, shield forensic psychiatrists.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the liability risks faced by forensic psychiatrists compared to general psychiatrists.
  • To explore the implications of the absence of a direct physician-patient relationship on malpractice claims.
  • To propose a model for understanding the duties and potential liabilities in forensic psychiatric practice.

Main Methods:

  • Review of legal principles governing malpractice and liability in psychiatric practice.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the nature of the physician-patient relationship in forensic contexts.
  • Conceptual modeling of duties and responsibilities in forensic psychiatry.

    • Main Results:

    • Forensic psychiatrists generally have reduced vulnerability to malpractice lawsuits compared to general psychiatrists.
    • While direct malpractice is less likely, other liabilities like defamation and ordinary negligence may arise.
    • A proposed model suggests a partial, secondary physician-patient relationship, often superseded by duties to truth or the hiring attorney.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed model for forensic psychiatry acknowledges conflicting duties and aims to clarify liability.
    • Emphasizing existing protections, such as judicial and quasi-judicial immunity, is crucial for forensic psychiatrists.
    • Understanding this model may enhance malpractice insurance coverage for specific duties within forensic practice.