Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Primary care: questions raised by a definition

G J Povar1

  • 1Department of Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.

The Journal of Family Practice
|February 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

The Institute of Medicine

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Selling products out of the office. Ethics and Human Rights Committee.

Annals of internal medicine·1999
Same author

The quality of primary care/consultant relationships in managed care: have we gone forward or backward?

The Journal of clinical ethics·1997
Same author

Evaluating competence in clinical ethics: is the OSCE the answer?

Journal of general internal medicine·1994
Same author

Setting limits in clinical medicine.

Archives of internal medicine·1994
Same author

"'How do you catch a cloud and pin it down?" (with apologies to Rogers and Hammerstein): a commentary on Layson and colleagues.

The Journal of clinical ethics·1994
Same author

Decision making with pregnant patients: a policy born of experience.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·1993

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Practice Evaluation
  • Healthcare Policy Analysis

Background:

  • The Institute of Medicine's "Defining Primary Care" report proposes key attributes for primary care.
  • Existing research methodologies, like ICD-9 coding, may not fully capture the integrated nature of primary care.
  • Accessibility as a primary care hallmark raises questions about healthcare organization and potential access barriers for certain populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the Institute of Medicine's proposed attributes for primary care.
  • To identify empirical and philosophical questions raised by the definition.
  • To explore the implications of these attributes for primary care research and evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Detailed analysis of the "Defining Primary Care: An Interim Report" by the Institute of Medicine.
  • Conceptual examination of primary care attributes such as integration and accessibility.
  • Identification of challenges for current research practices and evaluation criteria.

Main Results:

  • The proposed primary care attributes present significant unresolved empirical and philosophical challenges.
  • The integrated nature of primary care conflicts with data reduction methods like ICD-9 codes.
  • Accessibility as a primary care feature necessitates a re-evaluation of healthcare organization and access points.

Conclusions:

  • The Institute of Medicine's proposed primary care attributes require further research and critical thought.
  • Current research methods may be inadequate for evaluating primary care's integrated nature.
  • The attributes are not yet ready to be applied as definitive criteria for primary care practice evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos