Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 5, 2026
A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Is there a sex bias in the selection of permanent pacemaker implantations?
S R Raj1, F J Brennan, H Abdollah
1Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.
Objective:
To determine whether there is a sex bias in a historical cohort of consecutive patients who underwent initial pacemaker implantation at a Canadian teaching hospital by determining whether women were less likely to receive physiological pacemakers.
Design:
Retrospective chart review.
Setting:
A Canadian, tertiary care teaching hospital.
Patients:
A total of 446 patients (192 female) had a first-time pacemaker implantation between January 1, 1990 and September 30, 1993 at Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario.
Results:
Physiological pacemakers (dual chamber or atrial only) were implanted in 125 male patients (49.2%) and in 93 female patients (48.4%), for an absolute difference of 0.8%. In patients deemed eligible for physiological pacemaker implantation (absence of absolute or relative contraindications to physiological pacing), 63.8% of male patients and 60.6% of female patients received physiological pacemakers. Pacemakers with rate-modulation were implanted in 109 male patients (42.9%) and in 80 female patients (41.7%). These differences were not significant.
Conclusion:
No sex difference in the selection of physiological or rate-modulated permanent pacemakers was demonstrated in this study.
