Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Funding resuscitation research

W L Thompson, R Bellamy, R O Cummins

    Critical Care Medicine
    |February 1, 1996
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Resuscitation highlights in 2021.

    Resuscitation·2022
    Same author

    Resuscitation highlights in 2020.

    Resuscitation·2021
    Same author

    Resuscitation highlights in 2019.

    Resuscitation·2020
    Same author

    Resuscitation highlights in 2018.

    Resuscitation·2019
    Same author

    Resuscitation highlights in 2017.

    Resuscitation·2018
    Same author

    A paradigm for understanding trust and mistrust in medical research: The Community VOICES study.

    AJOB empirical bioethics·2018

    Funding for resuscitation research is declining due to managed care trends, creating barriers for innovation. Researchers need persuasive advocates and data to secure grants for life-saving therapies.

    Area of Science:

    • Emergency Medicine
    • Cardiovascular Research
    • Translational Science

    Background:

    • Managed care trends are reducing funding expectations for resuscitation research across industry and government agencies.
    • Barriers to innovation in resuscitation are increasing, as scientific merit alone is insufficient for securing grants.
    • Funding agencies like the National Institutes of Health are prioritizing molecular biology over life-saving therapies and integrated physiology research.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the decreasing support for resuscitation research.
    • To identify the challenges faced by researchers in obtaining funding.
    • To emphasize the need for persuasive advocacy and data to prioritize resuscitation research.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of funding trends from governmental, non-governmental, and industry sources.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the National Institutes of Health's research priorities.
  • Review of the impact of the current peer review system on resuscitation research.
  • Assessment of the challenges faced by university hospitals in funding clinical research.

    • Main Results:

    • Funding for resuscitation research is diminishing, impacting innovation and potentially patient care.
    • Industry funders are concerned with intellectual property and publication rights.
    • The National Institutes of Health's focus on molecular biology disadvantages resuscitation research.
    • The peer review system lacks dedicated advocates for resuscitation research.
    • The American Heart Association is beginning to consider funding basic resuscitation research after decades of educational focus.
    • Clinical departments in university hospitals face funding challenges for life-support research.

    Conclusions:

    • Resuscitation research faces significant funding challenges due to shifting priorities and systemic issues.
    • Investigators must develop persuasive strategies and present strong data to secure grants.
    • Advocacy is crucial to elevate the priority of research into pathophysiology and reversibility of terminal states and clinical death.