Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Controversy in breast reconstruction

C J Corral1, T A Mustoe

  • 1Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

The Surgical Clinics of North America
|April 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wound epithelialization deficits in the transforming growth factor-alpha knockout mouse.

Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society·2002
Same author

Monitoring buried head and neck free flaps with high-resolution color-duplex ultrasound.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same author

Oxygen in wound healing: more than a nutrient.

Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society·2001
Same author

Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons·2001
Same author

Differential activation of migration by hypoxia in keratinocytes isolated from donors of increasing age: implication for chronic wounds in the elderly.

The Journal of investigative dermatology·2001
Same author

Enhancement of wound healing by hyperbaric oxygen and transforming growth factor beta3 in a new chronic wound model in aged rabbits.

Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2000
Same journal

Social Determinants of Health, Health Disparities, and Surgical Equity.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Beyond the Scalpel's Reach.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions-Society.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions-Hospitals.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions for Providers.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
Same journal

Stepwise Solutions-Patients Social Determinants of Health, Health Disparities, and Surgical Equity.

The Surgical clinics of North America·2026
See all related articles

Breast reconstruction choices have evolved with breast conservation surgery and advances in oncology. Optimal outcomes depend on collaborative patient-surgeon-oncologist consultation for personalized breast reconstruction.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Oncology
  • Surgical Techniques

Background:

  • Trends in cancer ablative surgery increasingly favor breast conservation.
  • Advances in oncology, adjuvant therapy, and surgical techniques alter post-ablative defects.
  • Patient preferences regarding the timing and type of breast reconstruction are more defined.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss major controversies in breast reconstruction.
  • To highlight the evolution of reconstructive choices in response to surgical and oncological trends.
  • To emphasize the importance of patient-centered decision-making in breast reconstruction.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current trends in breast cancer surgery and reconstruction.
  • Analysis of the impact of oncological advances on surgical defects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of changing patient preferences in reconstructive surgery.

    • Main Results:

    • Breast conservation surgery has led to evolving reconstructive options.
    • Advances in adjuvant therapy and surgical techniques have modified defect characteristics.
    • Patients are increasingly involved in pre-determining their preferred reconstruction timing and type.

    Conclusions:

    • The field of breast reconstruction is dynamic, influenced by cancer treatment evolution.
    • Patient-driven preferences necessitate adaptable reconstructive strategies.
    • Multidisciplinary consultation among patient, oncologist, and surgeons is crucial for optimal, least controversial breast reconstruction outcomes.