Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis

G N Schaer1, O R Koechli, U Haller

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Reusable laparoscopic instruments are significantly more cost-effective than single-use options, saving over seven times the cost annually. This study informs decisions on instrument use balancing cost and patient care needs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[How I do… easily to reduce the operative time of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy].

Gynecologie, obstetrique, fertilite & senologie·2019
Same author

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2016
Same author

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2016
Same author

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2016
Same author

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2016
Same author

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2016

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Technology
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery relies heavily on specialized instruments.
  • The cost-effectiveness of reusable versus single-use surgical instruments is a critical consideration in healthcare management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine and compare the total annual costs associated with reusable and single-use laparoscopic instruments.
  • To inform clinical and administrative decisions regarding surgical instrument procurement and utilization.

Main Methods:

  • A 12-month prospective analysis of all laparoscopic operations was conducted.
  • Detailed records of instrument usage, depreciation, repairs, maintenance, cleaning, sterilization, and wages were maintained for reusable instruments.
  • Costs for single-use instruments were estimated based on purchase price and disposal fees for equivalent procedures.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The total annual cost for single-use laparoscopic instruments was found to be more than seven times higher than that for reusable instruments.
  • This significant cost difference highlights the economic advantage of reusable instrumentation in laparoscopic surgery.

Conclusions:

  • The study supports the continued primary use of reusable instruments for most laparoscopic operations due to substantial cost savings.
  • Single-use instruments are recommended for specific situations where their advantages outweigh the higher cost.
  • A balanced approach is advocated, considering both economic factors and the need for optimal instruments for particular procedures.