Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Assessing the effectiveness of cervical screening

S Wilson1, C Woodman

  • 1Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Withington, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology
|September 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Signaling through RXRb and its agonist, bexarotene, promotes neuron formation in Xenopus laevis embryos.

Biology open·2026
Same author

Promoting uptake of influenza vaccination among health care workers: a randomized controlled trial.

Journal of public health medicine·2002
Same author

Apparent low immunisation uptake in Dublin: under-performance or under-recording?

Irish medical journal·2001
Same author

Pharmacists' evaluation of key communication skills in practice.

Patient education and counseling·2000
Same author

Vaccine, yes; injection, no: maternal responses to the introduction of Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine.

The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners·2000
Same author

Low immunisation uptake: is the process the problem?

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2000

Mathematical models for cervical screening lack consistency in disease definition and assumptions, leading to unreliable cost-effectiveness conclusions. Model and data dependencies significantly impact outcomes, highlighting the need for improved modeling approaches.

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Cervical screening programs aim to reduce morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer.
  • Mathematical models are frequently employed to assess the cost-effectiveness of these screening programs.
  • Inconsistencies in current modeling approaches may limit the reliability of their conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the consistency and validity of mathematical models used for cervical screening.
  • To identify limitations and potential biases in existing cervical screening models.
  • To inform the development of more robust and reliable modeling techniques for cervical cancer prevention.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of mathematical models assessing cervical screening benefits and cost-effectiveness.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of variations in disease status definitions, model assumptions, and data inputs.
  • Critique of modeling methodologies, including the use of simplified models and the Markov process.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant heterogeneity exists in disease status definitions, assumptions, and data across reviewed models.
    • Many models employ oversimplified assumptions, such as ignoring dysplasia grades or assuming perfect test sensitivity.
    • The appropriateness of parameter values is difficult to ascertain, with many lacking robust documentation.

    Conclusions:

    • Conclusions from cervical screening models are highly dependent on the specific model and data used.
    • The identified inconsistencies and unrealistic assumptions raise concerns about the validity of current model-based recommendations.
    • Further research is needed to develop standardized and more realistic mathematical models for cervical cancer screening evaluation.