Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Healthy body weights: an alternative perspective

R P Abernathy1, D R Black

  • 1Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1362, USA.

The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
|March 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measured performance of filtration and ventilation systems for fine and ultrafine particles and ozone in an unoccupied modern California house.

Indoor air·2016
Same author

National Institute of Standards and Technology Synchrotron Radiation Facilities for Materials Science.

Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology·2016
Same author

The purdue stepped approach model: sequencing community and clinical interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk factors.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

A preferred target population for comprehensive health promotion.

International quarterly of community health education·2010
Same author

Mobile phones. precautionary options.

La Medicina del lavoro·2006
Same author

Evaluation of a screening test for female college athletes with eating disorders and disordered eating.

Journal of athletic training·2006
Same journal

Nourishing Collaboration: Interdisciplinary Nutrition Education for Health Care Professionals.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

Associations of red blood cell fatty acids with personality traits: 10-year follow-up in the Kibbutzim Family Study.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to: Vitamin D status and breast cancer in Saudi Arabian women: case-control study [Am J Clin Nutr 98 (2013) 105-110].

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

High postprandial endotoxemia is associated with recurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease: from the CORDIOPREV randomized clinical trial.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

Reply to Wu et al.: "Nitrate and nitrite food composition database: an update and extensive deep dive".

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
Same journal

Reframing Basic Experimental Studies in Humans-Implications for Nutrition Science.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2026
See all related articles

Healthy weight standards for adults suggest a Body Mass Index (BMI) between 19-25 for lower health risks. However, individual factors are crucial, and focusing on lifestyle changes can improve health even above ideal weight metrics.

Area of Science:

  • Nutrition Science
  • Public Health
  • Human Physiology

Background:

  • Establishing healthy weight standards is crucial for public health initiatives.
  • Previous research links Body Mass Index (BMI) to morbidity and mortality rates.
  • Current standards may not be universally applicable or beneficial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish healthy weight standards for adults.
  • To discuss the limitations of strict adherence to statistical weight guidelines.
  • To explore the physiological mechanisms underlying weight-associated health issues.

Main Methods:

  • Roundtable discussion among experts from the American Health Foundation.
  • Review of large-scale, long-term epidemiological studies.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of physiological markers related to obesity and metabolic health.

    • Main Results:

    • Lowest morbidity and mortality observed in adults with BMIs between 19-25 kg/m2.
    • Optimal body fat percentages range from 12-20% for men and 20-30% for women.
    • Weight-associated health issues often stem from impaired insulin sensitivity and function of fat cells.

    Conclusions:

    • Statistically derived weight and body fat standards are useful screening tools.
    • Strict adherence to BMI and body fat percentage guidelines may be counterproductive for some individuals.
    • Lifestyle interventions like diet and exercise can improve health markers independently of achieving ideal weight targets.