Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Plastic surgery's plastics

D K Ousterhout1, E J Stelnicki

  • 1University of California, (San Francisco,) Medical Center, San Francisco, USA.

Clinics in Plastic Surgery
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Novel bone adhesives: a comparison of bond strengths in vitro.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2013
Same author

Early treatment of severe mandibular hypoplasia with distraction mesenchymogenesis and bilateral free fibula flaps.

The Journal of craniofacial surgery·2001
Same author

Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same author

Remodeling of the temporomandibular joint following mandibular distraction osteogenesis in the transverse dimension.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same author

Nerve dependency in scarless fetal wound healing.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2000
Same author

Reconstruction of the posttraumatic short upper lip.

Annals of plastic surgery·1999

Alloplastic materials are crucial for craniofacial reconstruction. This review covers common implant materials, their mechanical properties, and surgical applications.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Craniofacial Surgery

Background:

  • Alloplastic materials are integral to modern craniofacial reconstructive surgery.
  • The selection of appropriate materials is critical for successful outcomes.
  • Advancements in biomaterials have expanded reconstructive possibilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review commonly used alloplastic implant materials in craniofacial reconstruction.
  • To summarize the mechanical properties of these materials.
  • To discuss their applications in reconstructive surgical procedures.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of alloplastic materials for craniofacial reconstruction.
  • Analysis of mechanical properties (e.g., strength, modulus, biocompatibility).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Summary of clinical applications and surgical techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • Several alloplastic materials are frequently employed, including porous polyethylene, polymethylmethacrylate, and titanium alloys.
    • Each material possesses distinct mechanical characteristics influencing its suitability for specific defects.
    • Successful reconstruction depends on matching material properties to anatomical site and functional demands.

    Conclusions:

    • Alloplastic materials offer versatile solutions for craniofacial skeletal reconstruction.
    • Understanding material properties is key to optimizing surgical planning and patient outcomes.
    • Continued research into novel biomaterials will further enhance reconstructive capabilities.