Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Critique of test methods for lifetime predictions

J E Ritter1

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA.

Dental Materials : Official Publication of the Academy of Dental Materials
|March 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Accurate ceramic failure predictions require understanding strength distribution and time-dependency. Rigorous testing and reliability analysis ensure ceramics perform successfully in demanding applications.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Expression, purification and characterization of recombinant phosphomannomutase and GDP-alpha-D-mannose pyrophosphorylase from Salmonella enterica, group B, for the synthesis of GDP-alpha-D-mannose from D-mannose.

Glycobiology·1996
Same author

A continuous microtiter plate assay for screening nucleotide sugar-synthesizing nucleotidyltransferases.

Analytical biochemistry·1996
Same author

Predicting lifetimes of materials and material structures.

Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials·1995
Same author

Use of fracture mechanics theory in lifetime predictions for alumina and bioglass-coated alumina.

Journal of biomedical materials research·1979

Area of Science:

  • Materials Science
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Reliability Engineering

Background:

  • Ceramic structural applications require accurate failure prediction.
  • Predicting ceramic failure relies on understanding strength distribution (m and sigma 0) and time-dependency of strength (n).
  • Experimental parameters are crucial for reliable ceramic design.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline a methodology for determining key experimental parameters for ceramic failure prediction.
  • To emphasize the importance of rigorous experimental design and reliability analysis for ceramic applications.

Main Methods:

  • Determining strength distribution (m and sigma 0) and time-dependency of strength (n) by measuring strength as a function of stressing rate.
  • Simulating service environment conditions during testing.
  • Testing a minimum of 30 samples per stressing rate across a range of at least 3 orders of magnitude to minimize parameter uncertainty.

Main Results:

  • Experimental parameters (m, sigma 0, n) can be accurately determined through controlled stressing rate tests.
  • Minimizing uncertainty in these parameters is achievable with sufficient sample sizes and stressing rate ranges.
  • Safety factors can be incorporated into design calculations to account for parameter uncertainty.

Conclusions:

  • Well-designed experiments and reliability analysis enable rational design decisions for ceramics.
  • Ensuring successful use of ceramics in demanding structural applications is achievable through robust characterization and analysis.
  • This approach enhances the reliability and safety of ceramic components in critical uses.

Related Experiment Videos