Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Morphometric applications in anatomic pathology

L D True1

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, 98195-6100, USA.

Human Pathology
|May 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prognostic value of Ki67 in localized prostate carcinoma: a multi-institutional study of >1000 prostatectomies.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2016
Same author

Metastatic conventional prostatic adenocarcinoma with diffuse chromogranin A and androgen receptor positivity.

Journal of clinical pathology·2004
Same author

Bone histology at autopsy and matched bone scintigraphy findings in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer: the effect of bisphosphonate therapy on bone scintigraphy results.

Clinical & experimental metastasis·2003
Same author

Cathepsin K mRNA and protein expression in prostate cancer progression.

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research·2003
Same author

Preexisting histologic evidence of prostatitis is unrelated to postimplant urinary morbidity.

International journal of cancer·2002
Same author

Consensus development of a histopathological classification system for chronic prostatic inflammation.

BJU international·2001
Same journal

TRPS1 and GATA3 Expression in BRG1/SMARCA4-deficient Malignant Neoplasms.

Human pathology·2026
Same journal

Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characteristics of Acral Melanomas Harboring RARA Fusions.

Human pathology·2026
Same journal

Clinical Impact of Second Opinion Consultation in Bladder Biopsies and Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors.

Human pathology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic relevance and molecular correlates of Claudin-1 expression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Human pathology·2026
Same journal

Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia: Lineage Assignment, Immunophenotypic Classification and Genetic Insights.

Human pathology·2026
Same journal

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia revisited: A comprehensive review with emphasis on the oligomonocytic subtype.

Human pathology·2026
See all related articles

Quantitative analysis of cell and tissue changes aids disease diagnosis and prognosis. Morphometry, the measurement of tissue components, is increasingly accessible with modern technology, enabling precise disease characterization.

Area of Science:

  • Pathology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Quantitative Biology

Background:

  • Cell and tissue changes in diseases are variable and quantifiable.
  • Quantitative data aids in disease diagnosis and prognosis.
  • Malignant tumors and non-neoplastic diseases show quantifiable tissue alterations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the principles of morphometry.
  • To illustrate various morphometric analysis techniques.
  • To highlight applications, errors, and limitations of morphometry.

Main Methods:

  • Morphometry involves quantifying changes in tissue components (cells, organelles) and their organization.
  • Utilizes quantitative evaluation tools and computational systems.
  • Includes area fraction, object counting, shape and size analyses, and multiparametric analyses.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Quantifiable features in malignant tumors include cell grade, architecture, and invasion extent.
  • Diagnosis and prognosis of non-neoplastic diseases like myopathy are improved by quantifying tissue changes.
  • Advances in computing and software have enhanced the ease of morphometric measurements.

Conclusions:

  • Morphometry is a valuable tool for disease diagnosis and prognosis.
  • Technological advancements have made morphometry more accessible and practical.
  • Understanding morphometric principles and limitations is crucial for accurate application.