Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Simple steps for improving multiple-reader studies in radiology

N A Obuchowski1, R C Zepp

  • 1Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195-5196, USA.

AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology
|March 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multi-vendor multi-site quantitative MRI analysis of cartilage degeneration 10 Years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MOON-MRI protocol and preliminary results.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2022
Same author

Donor-matched comparison of chondrogenic progenitors resident in human infrapatellar fat pad, synovium, and periosteum - implications for cartilage repair.

Connective tissue research·2019
Same author

Primary Cells Isolated from Human Knee Cartilage Reveal Decreased Prevalence of Progenitor Cells but Comparable Biological Potential During Osteoarthritic Disease Progression.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2018
Same author

Histopathological assessment of primary osteoarthritic knees in large patient cohort reveal the possibility of several potential patterns of osteoarthritis initiation.

Current research in translational medicine·2017
Same author

Meniscus treatment and age associated with narrower radiographic joint space width 2-3 years after ACL reconstruction: data from the MOON onsite cohort.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2015
Same author

Comparison of radiation dose and image quality from single-energy and dual-energy CT examinations in the same patients screened for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Clinical radiology·2014
Same journal

The Banality of Cancer: Entropy As a Third Pillar of Lung Nodule Risk Assessment.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

A Narrow Window for Artificial Intelligence-Generated Synthetic Temporal Bone CT From MRI.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

From Uncertainty to Actionable Management: The Isolated Abnormal Axillary Lymph Node.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Beyond Detection: Translating Artificial Intelligence-Driven Opportunistic Screening Into Clinical Action.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

Navigating PSMA PET Radiopharmaceuticals: Clinical and Operational Factors.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same journal

From Mesenteric Ischemia to Intestinal Stroke.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
See all related articles

Multiple-reader studies in radiology are increasingly common. However, analysis of 1995 research shows inconsistent reporting of reader variability and consensus methods, hindering reproducibility in diagnostic imaging research.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging Analysis
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Multiple-reader study designs are gaining prominence in radiology research.
  • There's a growing recognition of the value of multiple-reader studies for assessing diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the trend in multiple-reader versus single-reader study designs in radiology.
  • To evaluate the methodologies and reporting practices in multiple-reader studies published in the American Journal of Roentgenology.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative review of prospective image interpretation studies published in the American Journal of Roentgenology in 1990 and 1995.
  • Analysis of the Results sections of multiple-reader studies from 1995 to identify interpretation methods and reporting of reader variability.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The number of multiple-reader studies increased significantly from 1990 (8) to 1995 (29), while single-reader studies decreased.
  • In 1995, 55% of multiple-reader studies involved independent image interpretation, but only 24% reported inter-reader differences.
  • Consensus reading was used in 13 studies, often without clear methodology description.

Conclusions:

  • While multiple-reader study designs are more prevalent, reporting practices need improvement for clarity and reproducibility.
  • Standardization of reporting inter-reader variability and consensus methods is crucial for advancing diagnostic imaging research.