Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response modality affects human infant delayed-response performance

M Hofstadter1, J S Reznick

  • 1Yale University, New Haven, CT 065208205, USA.

Child Development
|April 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A review of the <i>in situ</i> probe designs from recent Ice Giant mission concept studies.

Space science reviews·2020
Same author

Maternal responses to child frustration and requests for help in dyads with fragile X syndrome.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2010
Same author

Ultra-relativistic electrons in Jupiter's radiation belts.

Nature·2002
Same author

When is an assessment an intervention? Parent perception of infant intentionality and language.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·2001
Same author

The development of visual expectations in the first year.

Child development·2000
Same author

Midazolam: effects on amnesia and anxiety in children.

Anesthesiology·2000
Same journal

Comprehension of "can" predicts performance on a nonverbal measure of modal concepts at 48 but not 36 months.

Child development·2026
Same journal

An associative learning account of how saliva becomes a cue for comfort.

Child development·2026
Same journal

If moms do it, it can't be that important: Children's reasoning about gender disparities in domestic work.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Adapting under stress: How sociocultural stress intensity and fluctuation shape youth school engagement and internalizing symptoms.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Children across diverse societies exchange reasons to resolve disagreements.

Child development·2026
Same journal

Beyond resources: Children in India and Germany have a multifaceted concept of fairness.

Child development·2026
See all related articles

Infant object permanence understanding improves with age. Gaze responses are more accurate than reach responses in delayed response tasks, reducing errors like the A-not-B error.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Development
  • Infant Psychology
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Background:

  • Understanding object permanence is crucial for cognitive development.
  • Infants' ability to track hidden objects develops over the first year of life.
  • The role of response modality in early cognitive tasks is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of response modality (gaze vs. reach) on infant delayed response performance.
  • To examine age-related changes in object permanence and error patterns.
  • To explore the influence of response modality on perseverative errors and side biases.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed delayed response performance in 120 infants aged 5-11 months using object hiding tasks.
  • Compared accuracy and error types (e.g., A-not-B error) between gaze and reach response conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed age-related trends and modality-specific effects on performance.
  • Main Results:

    • Performance improved significantly with age across all conditions.
    • Gaze responses were more accurate than reach responses, particularly when gaze and reach directions differed.
    • Infants in the reach condition made more A-not-B errors and showed increased perseverative responding, suggesting modality-specific priming effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Response modality significantly impacts delayed response performance in infants.
    • Gaze-based responses appear more robust and less prone to certain errors than reach-based responses.
    • Findings highlight the importance of considering motor output in assessing early cognitive abilities.