Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

"Routine" preoperative studies. Which studies in which patients?

P W Marcello1, P L Roberts

  • 1Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey-Hitchcock Clinic, Burlington, MA, USA.

The Surgical Clinics of North America
|February 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary

Routine preoperative mass screening is often unnecessary, costing billions with limited benefits. Selective testing offers a more accurate preoperative assessment, but requires a reliable system to avoid missing crucial tests.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What is the optimal management of an intra-operative air leak in a colorectal anastomosis?

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2017
Same author

What are 30-day postoperative outcomes following splenic flexure mobilization during anterior resection?

Techniques in coloproctology·2013
Same author

Removal of TSE agent from plasma products manufactured in the United Kingdom.

Vox sanguinis·2012
Same author

How often do patients return to the operating room after colorectal resections?

Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland·2011
Same author

Prostate cancer treatment ascertained from several sources: analysis of disagreement and error.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2011
Same author

Prospective cohort study of microbial and inflammatory events immediately preceding Escherichia coli recurrent urinary tract infection in women.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2009

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Patient Assessment

Background:

  • Mass screening of preoperative patients lacks demonstrated utility for most tests.
  • Current preoperative examinations result in significant healthcare expenditure ($30 billion annually) with minimal patient benefit.
  • Unnecessary testing leads to increased healthcare costs and potential iatrogenic injury from false-positive results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness and necessity of mass screening in preoperative patient assessments.
  • To highlight the financial and clinical drawbacks of routine preoperative testing.
  • To advocate for a selective approach to preoperative examinations.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of the utility and cost-effectiveness of mass screening versus selective testing in preoperative settings.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of existing data on unnecessary preoperative examinations and their consequences.
  • Assessment of the potential benefits and risks of selective preoperative testing strategies.

    • Main Results:

    • The majority of preoperative mass screening tests have not demonstrated utility.
    • Approximately 60% of the $30 billion spent annually on preoperative examinations are deemed unnecessary.
    • False-positive results from routine testing can lead to iatrogenic injuries.

    Conclusions:

    • Selective utilization of routine examinations can enhance clinician evaluation and preoperative assessment.
    • A balanced approach is needed to weigh the benefits of selective testing against the risk of omitting warranted examinations.
    • There is a clear need for a more reliable system for ordering preoperative tests to optimize patient care and resource allocation.