Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Maintenance of a Lateral Fluid Percussion Injury Device
Published on: April 21, 2023
The outcome for children with blunt trauma is best at a pediatric trauma center
J R Hall1, H M Reyes, J L Meller
1Division of Pediatric Surgery, Cook County Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
Insights
Pediatric trauma patients, especially those with blunt trauma, experience better outcomes at designated pediatric trauma centers (DPTCs). Outcomes for penetrating trauma patients did not differ significantly between DPTCs and adult centers.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Trauma Care
- Trauma Surgery Outcomes
- Public Health
Background:
- Pediatric trauma patients treated in adult trauma centers show similar mortality rates to the Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS) when analyzed by TRISS methodology.
- The effectiveness of designated pediatric trauma centers (DPTCs) for improving outcomes in injured children remains a key question in trauma research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test the hypothesis that pediatric trauma patients have better outcomes when treated at a DPTC compared to adult trauma centers.
- To compare outcomes of pediatric trauma patients treated at a DPTC with historical data from the MTOS and the National Pediatric Trauma Registry (NPTR).
Main Methods:
- Review of 1,797 pediatric trauma patient records (ages 0-15) admitted to a DPTC between 1987 and 1993.
- Application of TRISS methodology for survival probability calculation and comparison with MTOS data.
- Comparison of outcomes based on the admitting Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) against NPTR data.
Main Results:
- Overall pediatric trauma patient outcomes at the DPTC showed a Z score of +1.4199 (P > .1).
- Patients with blunt trauma (BT) had significantly better outcomes at the DPTC (Z score = +3.3501, P < .001) compared to MTOS data, particularly those with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 9 or higher.
- Penetrating trauma (PT) patient outcomes did not differ significantly from MTOS data. Nonoperative management of blunt abdominal injuries was more successful at the DPTC.
Conclusions:
- Designated pediatric trauma centers (DPTCs) offer significantly better outcomes for children with blunt trauma injuries.
- The treatment of penetrating trauma in children yields similar outcomes whether managed in DPTCs or adult trauma centers.
- DPTCs facilitate successful nonoperative management of blunt abdominal injuries, suggesting these centers should be prioritized for pediatric blunt trauma cases.
Purpose:
The mortality rate for pediatric trauma patients cared for in adult trauma centers has been shown, by means of TRISS methodology, not to differ significantly from that of the Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS). The question remains, however, whether the outcome of injured children is better in a designated pediatric trauma center (DPTC). The authors' hypothesis is that outcome is better at a DPTC.
Methods:
The records of 1,797 children (0 to 15 years of age) admitted to a DPTC between 1987 and 1993 were reviewed. TRISS methodology was used to calculate probability of survival for outcome comparison with the MTOS. The data also was compared with outcome in relation to the admitting Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) reported in the National Pediatric Trauma Registry (NPTR).
Results:
The outcome of all children at this DPTC had a Z score of +1.4199 (P > .1). The Z score of children admitted because of penetrating trauma (PT, n = 460) did not differ significantly from that of the MTOS. However, the children admitted because of blunt trauma (BT, n = 1,337) had a Z score of +3.3501 (M score = .90), which is significantly better than that of the MTOS (P < .001). The BT population with an ISS of > or = 9 (n = 149) had a Z score of +2.8686 (P < .005) (M = .95). By GCS comparison, the BT group had a outcome similar to that reported in the NPTR. Head injury was the cause of death for 26 (84%) of the 31 PT deaths and 20 (83%) of the 24 BT deaths (three of the remaining four had associated severe head injury). Only 1 of 24 (4%) BT liver injuries and 5 (21%) of 24 BT splenic injuries required surgical intervention. This low incidence of liver and splenic surgical invention is similar to that reported by other DPTCs, but for children treated at adult centers the rates are 37% to 58% and 43% to 53% for liver & splenic surgical intervention, respectively.
Conclusion:
Children with BT have a significantly better outcome at a DPTC; the outcome for children with PT does not differ. Successful nonoperative treatment of blunt abdominal injuries is more likely to occur at a DPTC than at adult trauma centers "with pediatric committment." Thus, children with blunt injuries should be taken to a DPTC, when available.
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the procedure...
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction

