Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Putting a finger on the deep inguinal ring

B T Andrews1, K G Burnand, D Ferrar

  • 1Department of Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
|April 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breath testing for intra-abdominal infection: appendicitis, a preliminary study.

Journal of breath research·2020
Same author

Compression therapy for leg disorders: Critique 2.

Journal of wound care·2016
Same author

Outcome of the external carotid artery following carotid endarterectomy with added external carotid artery eversion endarterectomy.

Annals of vascular diseases·2013
Same author

The role of endothelial cells and their progenitors in intimal hyperplasia.

Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease·2010
Same author

Quality of life after surgical reduction for severe primary lymphoedema of the limbs and genitalia.

The British journal of surgery·2009
Same author

Hereditary palmoplantar keratoderma associated with primary (congenital) lymphedema.

Lymphology·2009
Same journal

Haematuria investigation based on a standard protocol: emphasis on the diagnosis of urological malignancy.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2003
Same journal

The Dundee protocol for investigation of haematuria.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2003
Same journal

A novel idea for the treatment of fistula-in-ano.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2003
Same journal

Penile metastasis: an unusual presentation of metastatic colonic cancer.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2003
Same journal

Clinical and functional results of open operative repair for Achilles tendon rupture in a non-specialist surgical unit.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2003
Same journal

Cellular transplantation: new horizons in the surgical management of heart failure.

Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh·2003
See all related articles

Clinical examination to differentiate direct and indirect inguinal hernias is unreliable. Anatomical landmarks like the mid-inguinal point do not accurately predict the deep inguinal ring

Area of Science:

  • Surgical anatomy
  • Hernia research
  • Clinical diagnostics

Background:

  • Distinguishing direct and indirect inguinal hernias preoperatively is clinically significant.
  • Current methods rely on digital pressure over the deep inguinal ring.
  • The accuracy of anatomical landmarks for locating the deep inguinal ring is questionable.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the reliability of common anatomical landmarks in predicting the deep inguinal ring's position.
  • To assess the clinical feasibility of differentiating inguinal hernia types based on physical examination.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective study of 25 patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery.
  • Preoperative identification of the mid-inguinal point and mid-inguinal ligament midpoint.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Intraoperative measurement of the deep inguinal ring's precise location.
  • Comparison of landmark positions with the actual deep inguinal ring.

    • Main Results:

    • Neither the mid-inguinal point nor the mid-inguinal ligament midpoint accurately predicted the deep inguinal ring's position.
    • The deep inguinal ring was located 0.52 cm lateral to the mid-inguinal point on average.
    • The deep inguinal ring was located 0.46 cm medial to the mid-inguinal ligament midpoint on average.

    Conclusions:

    • Clinical differentiation of direct and indirect inguinal hernias using palpation of fixed landmarks is unreliable.
    • The variability in deep inguinal ring position challenges preoperative diagnostic accuracy.
    • Further research into reliable diagnostic methods for inguinal hernias is warranted.