Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Limitations, definitions, principles and methods of risk analysis

D W North1

  • 1Decision Focus Incorporated, Mountain View, California 94041-2055, USA.

Revue Scientifique Et Technique (International Office of Epizootics)
|December 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Risk assessment guides decisions on veterinary biologicals, balancing scientific judgment with regulatory needs. Quantitative methods can manage uncertainty and improve consensus in this complex field.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk assessment for ingested inorganic arsenic: A review and status report.

Environmental geochemistry and health·2013
Same author

A perspective on nuclear waste.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2000
Same author

Monograph: reassessment of human cancer risk of aldrin/dieldrin.

Toxicology letters·1999
Same author

Inorganic arsenic: a need and an opportunity to improve risk assessment.

Environmental health perspectives·1997
Same author

Risk characterization: A bridge to informed decision making.

Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology·1997
Same author

Conclusion: challenges for the future.

Environmental health perspectives·1993

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Medicine
  • Risk Assessment
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • Decisions regarding veterinary biologicals present significant uncertainties and complexities across multiple scientific disciplines.
  • These decisions have substantial potential impacts on public health and key economic sectors.
  • Harmonizing international risk assessment practices is challenging due to diverse regulatory traditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore how risk assessment can effectively guide decision-making for veterinary biologicals.
  • To examine the potential for harmonizing international risk assessment practices.
  • To advocate for a broad view of risk assessment as a framework for scientific judgment in regulatory decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewing major reports defining risk assessment practices in regulatory agencies, particularly in the USA.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzing an example of risk assessment for microbial contamination to illustrate quantitative methods.
  • Discussing the application of quantitative methods in situations with sparse data and high uncertainty.

    • Main Results:

    • A broad view of risk assessment as a framework for summarizing scientific judgment is supported by major US regulatory agency practices.
    • Some stakeholders perceive US risk assessment as overly quantitative and narrowly focused on carcinogen standards.
    • Quantitative methods can be effectively applied even with limited data, aiding decisions under uncertainty.

    Conclusions:

    • Risk assessment is crucial for navigating uncertainties in veterinary biologicals regulation.
    • Quantitative methods enhance communication, consensus-building, and research prioritization in risk management.
    • Adopting a comprehensive approach to risk assessment is vital for informed regulatory decisions.