Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Litigation in anaesthesia

N A Coleman1

  • 1Department of Intensive Care, Royal Liverpool University NHS Trust.

British Journal of Hospital Medicine
|January 6, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Physicians, particularly anaesthetists, face increasing legal challenges. This review examines recent cases to highlight current legal system difficulties for medical professionals and litigants.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antioxidants in critical care medicine.

Environmental toxicology and pharmacology·2011
Same author

Management of an unusual case of acute respiratory failure with a double-lumen endobronchial tube.

Intensive care medicine·2007
Same author

Estimates of the maternal mortality ratio in two districts of the Brong-Ahafo region, Ghana.

Bulletin of the World Health Organization·2001
Same author

Intensive care of the trauma patient.

Resuscitation·2001
Same author

Inadequate pre-operative evaluation and preparation: a review of 197 reports from the Australian incident monitoring study.

Anaesthesia·2000
Same author

The impact of traditional birth attendant training on delivery complications in Ghana.

Health policy and planning·2000
Same journal

The autopsy in the 1990s.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

Screening for breast cancer.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

Cost-effective monotherapy of concomitant benign prostatic hyperplasia and hypertension.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

Liposarcoma: a review of current diagnosis and management.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

How to do it in surgery: laparoscopic rectopexy.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
Same journal

The management of ovarian cancer.

British journal of hospital medicine·1999
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Medical Law
  • Anaesthesiology
  • Legal Medicine

Background:

  • Medical malpractice litigation is rising in the country.
  • Anaesthetists are frequently involved in legal disputes.
  • The current legal system presents challenges for all parties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze recent legal cases involving anaesthetists.
  • To illustrate the complexities of the legal system in medical malpractice.
  • To provide insights into the difficulties faced by doctors and claimants.

Main Methods:

  • Review of selected recent legal cases concerning anaesthetists.
  • Analysis of case specifics and legal outcomes.
  • Discussion of systemic challenges identified through case examples.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Recent cases reveal significant hurdles in medical litigation.
  • Complexities in proving negligence and causation are evident.
  • The legal process can be arduous for both medical practitioners and patients.

Conclusions:

  • The increasing trend of litigation necessitates a review of legal processes.
  • Understanding case law is crucial for anaesthetists and legal professionals.
  • Potential reforms may be needed to address current system difficulties.