Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Test question modulates cue competition between causes and between effects

H Matute1, F Arcediano, R R Miller

  • 1Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Deusto, Bilbao, Spain. univem05@sarenet.es

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Plasma and acrosomal membrane lipid content of saltwater crocodile spermatozoa.

Reproduction, fertility, and development·2021
Same author

Examining Differences in Recovery Outcomes between Male and Female Hip Fracture Patients: Design and Baseline Results of a Prospective Cohort Study from the Baltimore Hip Studies.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2018
Same author

Multi-site and nasal swabbing for carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: what does a single nose swab predict?

The Journal of hospital infection·2017
Same author

Time as content in Pavlovian conditioning.

Behavioural processes·2014
Same author

Multiple-strain colonization in nasal carriers of Staphylococcus aureus.

Journal of clinical microbiology·2014
Same author

Flying-fox (Pteropus spp.) sperm membrane fatty acid composition, its relationship to cold shock injury and implications for cryopreservation success.

Cryobiology·2012
Same journal

Memory loves company: Related object pairs benefit working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Ranschburg unrepeated.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times: Evidence for switch cost beyond stimulus-response tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study shows how the way a question is asked influences whether causes or effects compete. Understanding this bidirectional learning process is key for different applications.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Making
  • Learning Processes

Background:

  • Replication of the established phenomenon of competition between causes (C).
  • Investigation into the controversial presence and absence of competition between effects (E).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the role of the test question in eliciting competition between causes and effects.
  • To explore conditions under which neither causes nor effects compete.

Main Methods:

  • Examined probability judgments of causes given effects (p(C/E)) and effects given causes (p(E/C)).
  • Manipulated the framing of test questions to implicitly compare probabilities (e.g., p(E/C) vs. p(E/C')).
  • Identified conditions that lead to competitive and non-competitive learning.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Competition between causes (C) observed when test questions queried p(E/C) vs. p(E/C').
  • Competition between effects (E) observed when test questions queried p(C/E) vs. p(C/E').
  • Effects competed for diagnostic value, analogous to causes competing for predictive value.

Conclusions:

  • The test question is a critical factor determining competitive or non-competitive outcomes.
  • Learning processes are bidirectional and can be non-competitive.
  • The application of learned information (competitively/non-competitively, forward/backward) depends on test demands.