Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Base rates in category learning

J K Kruschke1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405, USA. kruschke@indiana.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|January 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Associative learning in baboons (Papio papio) and humans (Homo sapiens): species differences in learned attention to visual features.

Animal cognition·2014
Same author

Using cognitive science methods to assess the role of social information processing in sexually coercive behavior.

Psychological assessment·2002
Same author

The inverse base-rate effect is not explained by eliminative inference.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same author

The role of attention shifts in the categorization of continuous dimensioned stimuli.

Psychological research·2001
Same author

Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2001
Same author

Rules and exemplars in category learning.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·1998
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study reveals that category base rates influence judgments by affecting learning order, not just cue interpretation. Frequent categories are learned first, leading to distinct feature encoding for both common and rare categories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Machine Learning

Background:

  • Previous research shows inconsistent use of category base rates in judgments.
  • Observed phenomena include inverse base-rate effects and base-rate neglect.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose common principles underlying base-rate effects in category judgments.
  • To demonstrate that base-rate information is learned and consistently applied.
  • To formalize these principles in a connectionist model.

Main Methods:

  • Four new experiments were conducted to test the proposed principles.
  • A novel connectionist model was developed to simulate the findings.

Main Results:

  • Evidence supports the principle that base rates influence learning order, with frequent categories learned before rare ones.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Frequent categories are encoded by typical features, while rare categories are encoded by distinctive features.
  • The connectionist model successfully accounts for these effects, shifting attention to distinctive features.

    • Conclusions:

    • A unified account for inverse base-rate effects and base-rate neglect is proposed.
    • Base-rate information is learned and consistently applied, impacting feature encoding.
    • Connectionist modeling offers a framework for understanding category judgment dynamics.