Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface

T Jemt1, J E Rubenstein, L Carlsson

  • 1Brånemark Clinic, Göteborg, Sweden.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|March 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Health status and health care utilization after discharge from geriatric in-hospital stay - description of a register-based study.

BMC health services research·2021
Same author

Prognostic role of serum thymidine kinase 1 kinetics during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

ESMO open·2021
Same author

Life situation 5 years after subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Acta neurologica Scandinavica·2017
Same author

Molecular subtype and tumor characteristics of breast cancer metastases as assessed by gene expression significantly influence patient post-relapse survival.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2014
Same author

Angiogenic factors in relation to clinical effect in a phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel.

Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2013
Same author

The osseointegration stimulatory effect of macrogeometry-modified implants: a study in the rabbit.

Clinical oral implants research·2013

Researchers compared four systems for measuring fit at the prosthodontic interface. All systems can detect clinical misfits, but only one is suitable for intraoral use, highlighting the need for precise fit measurements in implant prosthodontics.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Engineering
  • Prosthodontics

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of fit at the prosthodontic interface is critical for successful implant-supported restorations.
  • Developing reliable systems for quantifying this fit is an ongoing challenge in dental research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare four different systems developed for measuring fit at the prosthodontic interface.
  • To evaluate the capabilities and limitations of these systems in detecting clinically relevant misfits.

Main Methods:

  • Four centers developed and utilized distinct measurement systems: two stylus contact, one laser-based, and one photogrammetric.
  • Data were collected as 3D coordinates and transformed into linear and angular measurements.
  • The centroid of bearing surfaces was used as the primary measurement unit for system comparison.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All four systems demonstrated the potential to detect clinically significant misfits.
  • Only one system was found to be suitable for intraoral application.
  • Comparisons indicated that data should be rounded to the nearest 10 microns, with misfits calculated in terms smaller than 10 microns.

Conclusions:

  • Multiple systems can effectively measure fit at the prosthodontic interface, but intraoral applicability varies.
  • Repeatability assessment is crucial for establishing the reliability of any measurement system.
  • Clinicians require precise fit data to inform treatment decisions for implant prosthodontics.