Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamic delay and maximal dynamic error in continuous biosensors

D A Baker1, D A Gough

  • 1Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093, USA.

Analytical Chemistry
|April 15, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding the Usefulness of Self-Escape Technologies in Underground Mining: Perspectives of Metal/Nonmetal Miners.

Mining, metallurgy & exploration·2025
Same author

Don't touch that dial: Psychological reactance, transparency, and user acceptance of smart thermostat setting changes.

PloS one·2023
Same author

Four Ironies of Self-quantification: Wearable Technologies and the Quantified Self.

Science and engineering ethics·2020
Same author

Metabolomic identification of diagnostic serum-based biomarkers for advanced stage melanoma.

Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society·2019
Same author

N-acetylcysteine decreases binge eating in a rodent model.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2016
Same author

Making sense of research on the neuroimage bias.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2015
Same journal

Modeling the Effects of Short-Range Randomness in Packed Sphere Beds.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Mitochondrial Redox Cascade-Directed Covalent NIR Fluorogenic Imaging of Therapy-Induced Senescence Integrates Tumor and Host Responses.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Proteomic Profiling of RHD-Related Mitral Annulus Calcification Enabled by Magnetic Carbon Nanomaterial-Supported Quasi-Immobilized Enzyme Digestion.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Spatial-Photonic Encoding on a Single Fiber: Breaking the Bottleneck in Photoelectrochemical Biosensing for Precision Diagnostics.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Spreadable Biosensing Pregel for Analyte Visualization in Peeled Plant Tissues.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same journal

DARibo-Q: RNA Allosteric Transduction for Fluorescence Imaging of Dopamine Modulation in Living Systems.

Analytical chemistry·2026
See all related articles

Continuous biosensors exhibit dynamic delay and error, impacting real-time analyte concentration readings. Understanding these factors is crucial for designing accurate and reliable continuous monitoring systems, like glucose sensors.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Sensor Technology

Background:

  • Continuous biosensors are essential for real-time monitoring of analyte concentrations.
  • Dynamic delay and dynamic error are inherent characteristics of continuously operated biosensors.
  • These dynamic parameters affect the accuracy of reported analyte concentrations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the relationship between biosensor signal, analyte concentration, dynamic delay, and dynamic error.
  • To develop a framework for estimating worst-case dynamic error in real-time sensor operation.
  • To propose alternative characterization methods for continuous biosensors.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical analysis of dynamic delay and dynamic error.
  • Modeling the impact of external mass transfer and biosensor properties.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of concepts to in vitro continuous glucose sensor data.
  • Main Results:

    • Dynamic delay is determined by biosensor properties and mass transfer.
    • Dynamic error is the product of dynamic delay and the rate of concentration change.
    • Maximal dynamic error estimation is necessary for worst-case scenario analysis.
    • Alternative characterization methods offer advantages over standard response time for continuous operation.

    Conclusions:

    • Dynamic delay and error are critical for continuous biosensor performance.
    • Acceptable values for dynamic delay and error can guide biosensor design.
    • The proposed analysis provides a foundation for improved continuous biosensor characterization and design.