Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Marking systems for multiple choice examinations

L G Whitby

    Medical Education
    |May 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study examines scoring systems in assessments, comparing penalty and no-penalty marking. It explores methods to mitigate guessing and assess candidate confidence, crucial for accurate evaluation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Consequences of the provision of laboratory services for the National Health Service by commercial firms: a view from the university sector.

    Journal of clinical pathology·1990
    Same author

    Clinical biochemistry-- problems and prospects.

    Scottish medical journal·1982
    Same author

    Industrial action by ASTMS.

    British medical journal·1980
    Same author

    Computer applications in clinical enzymology.

    Clinical biochemistry·1979
    Same author

    Out-of-hours services by medical laboratory scientific officers.

    British medical journal·1979
    Same author

    The peak monitor of the Technicon SMAC system.

    Clinical chemistry·1978
    Same journal

    Exploring nurse practitioners' views on the key elements shaping their professional identities within interspecialty practice: A Q methodology study.

    Medical education·2026
    Same journal

    Correspondence: Peer support is not a substitute for institutional reform in mental health disclosure amongst medical students.

    Medical education·2026
    Same journal

    When I say validity.

    Medical education·2026
    Same journal

    Channelling Socrates to re-imagine asynchronous online learning.

    Medical education·2026
    Same journal

    Moving beyond tokenism: A structured and intentional approach to embedding health advocacy in medical education.

    Medical education·2026
    Same journal

    When I say … 'in situ simulation'.

    Medical education·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Educational Measurement
    • Psychometrics

    Background:

    • Traditional marking systems often face challenges with candidate guessing.
    • Accurate assessment of knowledge requires addressing response uncertainty.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the pros and cons of penalty and no-penalty marking schemes.
    • To review strategies for correcting guessing in assessments.
    • To evaluate the utility of 'don't know' options and confidence-weighting.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of marking system advantages and disadvantages.
    • Review of existing examiner techniques for guessing correction.
    • Exploration of confidence-weighting and 'don't know' option implementation.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Penalty systems aim to deter guessing but can penalize knowledgeable candidates.
    • No-penalty systems may encourage guessing but avoid penalizing uncertainty.
    • 'Don't know' options and confidence-weighting offer insights into response certainty.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of marking system impacts assessment validity and reliability.
    • Strategies to address guessing and assess confidence are vital for accurate educational measurement.
    • Further research into optimal methods for handling response uncertainty is warranted.