Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Three routine methods for measuring high-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with the Reference Method

N Harris1, V Galpchian, N Rifai

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Clinical Chemistry
|May 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

ASO Visual Abstract: Post-operative Impact of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.

Annals of surgical oncology·2025
Same author

Postoperative Impact of Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Following Oncoplastic Breast Surgery.

Annals of surgical oncology·2025
Same author

The SuPPORT project: Supporting Parents and Professionals through NeOnatal resuscitation in theatre. Phases 1 and 2: qualitative synthesis and capture of current practice.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2025
Same author

Development and evaluation of the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation to deliver Physical Activity in School Scale (COM-PASS).

The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity·2024
Same author

Skin pain and sleep quality numeric rating scales for children aged 6 months to 5 years with atopic dermatitis.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2024
Same author

Prevalence of antibiotic resistance and virulence genes in the biofilms from an aquifer recharged with stormwater.

Water research·2020
Same journal

Comparison of Information-Dependent Acquisition and Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra for Untargeted Drug Testing on a Linear Ion Trap-Pulsing Quadrupole-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometer.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Patterns of One-Year Change in HbA1c and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) Metrics in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

TSH Pediatric Reference Intervals: Lack of CALIPER Applicability to US-Based Populations.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Rapid Detection of Hemoglobinopathy Variants Using One-Step Library Preparation and Nanopore Sequencing.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

Editor's Note: Circulating Proteolytic Products of Carboxypeptidase N for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

Clinical chemistry·2026
Same journal

In Reply to Reflexing NT-proBNP for sFlt-1/PlGF Ratios That Fall into the Measurement Uncertainty for Preeclampsia Risk Classification.

Clinical chemistry·2026
See all related articles

Three methods for quantifying high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) showed good precision but variable accuracy. A direct assay offers speed and minimal sample preparation, even with high triglyceride levels.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Biochemistry
  • Laboratory Medicine

Background:

  • Accurate quantification of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is crucial for cardiovascular risk assessment.
  • High triglyceride (TG) concentrations can interfere with standard HDL-C assays.
  • Evaluating novel HDL-C quantification methods is essential for improving diagnostic accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of three distinct HDL-C quantification methods against a reference method.
  • To assess the impact of varying triglyceride concentrations on assay accuracy and precision.
  • To identify the most reliable and efficient HDL-C assay for clinical use.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of three HDL-C assays (magnetic dextran sulfate precipitation, direct method, MgCl2-dextran sulfate) with a reference method.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Testing samples across a broad range of triglyceride concentrations (290-18000 mg/L).
  • Evaluation of assay precision (run-to-run CV) and error (systematic and total) against NCEP goals.

    • Main Results:

    • All three assays demonstrated good precision (CV ≤ 4.1%).
    • Systematic error exceeded NCEP goals (≤ 10%) in 50% of tested ranges.
    • The magnetic and direct assays showed no interference from high TG levels (up to 18000 mg/L), unlike the MgCl2-dextran sulfate method.

    Conclusions:

    • While precise, the tested HDL-C assays exhibit variable accuracy, particularly with high triglyceride levels.
    • The direct HDL-C assay offers advantages in speed, minimal sample preparation, and robustness against high TG interference.
    • The direct assay is a promising alternative for accurate HDL-C quantification in diverse clinical samples.