Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cognitive sequence knowledge: what is learned?

J L Wenger1, R A Carlson

  • 1Department of Social Sciences, University of West Alabama, Livingston 35470, USA. livjw01@uwamail.westal.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|May 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A unified theory for psychologists?

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2014
Same author

Detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis: comparing fecal culture versus serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and direct fecal polymerase chain reaction.

Journal of dairy science·2008
Same author

Geostatistical based monitoring of soil water NO3- -N: a potential nonpoint source of ground water contamination.

Journal of environmental science and health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous substances & environmental engineering·2002
Same author

Distributing working memory resources during problem solving.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same author

Children's theories of god: explanations for difficult-to-explain phenomena.

The Journal of genetic psychology·2001
Same author

Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Task structure impacts cognitive performance. Simple tasks benefit from consistent steps, while complex tasks show gains from consistent operation mapping, improving working memory efficiency.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Factors Engineering

Background:

  • Sequential tasks require managing operations and subgoals.
  • Working memory capacity influences performance in complex cognitive tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how task structure, specifically subgoal consistency and operation sequencing, affects performance in running-arithmetic tasks.
  • To determine the conditions under which sequence consistency benefits cognitive performance.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted using running-arithmetic tasks.
  • Participants performed tasks with varying subgoal structures and operation sequences.
  • Performance was measured by speed and accuracy.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consistent transitions between steps aided performance in simple subgoal structures.
  • Consistent operation-to-location mapping offered a slight benefit in complex subgoal structures.
  • Overall, subgoal structure consistency significantly improved speed and accuracy.

    • Conclusions:

    • Task complexity and subgoal structure interact with sequence consistency to influence performance.
    • Benefits of sequence consistency are linked to enhanced working memory efficiency.
    • Understanding subgoal structure is crucial for optimizing task design and cognitive load.