Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Structural alignment in induction and similarity

M E Lassaline1

  • 1Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA. mlassali@s.psych.uiuc.edu

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|May 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Whole genome sequencing identified a 16 kilobase deletion on ECA13 associated with distichiasis in Friesian horses.

BMC genomics·2020
Same author

A missense mutation in damage-specific DNA binding protein 2 is a genetic risk factor for ocular squamous cell carcinoma in Belgian horses.

Equine veterinary journal·2019
Same author

Induction and category coherence.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Combined keratectomy, strontium-90 irradiation and permanent bulbar conjunctival grafts for corneolimbal squamous cell carcinomas in horses (1990-2002): 38 horses.

Veterinary ophthalmology·2007
Same author

Profiles of matrix metalloproteinase activity in equine tear fluid during corneal healing in 10 horses with ulcerative keratitis.

Veterinary ophthalmology·2004
Same author

Connective tissue growth factor in tear film of the horse: detection, identification and origin.

Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie·2003
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Shared attributes enhance perceived similarity and inductive reasoning. Causal relations influence similarity, while binding causal relations are key for inductive strength, impacting how we make inferences.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology

Background:

  • The structural alignment view posits that shared representations drive similarity perception.
  • Unshared attributes linked to commonalities are considered candidate inferences in inductive reasoning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between similarity and induction.
  • To test the structural alignment view by examining the roles of shared attributes and relations.

Main Methods:

  • Five experiments were conducted using novel and familiar animal pairs.
  • Varied the number of shared attributes and the presence of causal and noncausal relations.
  • Assessed similarity and inductive strength judgments.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Increased shared attributes positively influenced both similarity and inductive strength.
  • Shared causal relations affected perceived similarity.
  • Binding causal relations were crucial for inductive strength.

Conclusions:

  • Shared attributes are fundamental for both similarity and induction.
  • The type of relation (causal vs. noncausal, binding vs. shared) differentially impacts similarity and induction.
  • Findings support the structural alignment view of cognitive processes.