Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Experimental personality designs: analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions

S G West1, L S Aiken, J L Krull

  • 1Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-1104, USA.

Journal of Personality
|March 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Effect of Different Forms of Centering in Hierarchical Linear Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Multilevel Modeling of Individual and Group Level Mediated Effects.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

SIMULTANEOUS PROCESSING OF TYPAL AND DIMENSIONAL VARIATION AMONG MULTIDIMENSIONAL EVENTS.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Stress responses to repeated exposure to a combined physical and social evaluative laboratory stressor in young healthy males.

Psychoneuroendocrinology·2015
Same author

An examination of the bidirectional relationship between functioning and symptom levels in patients with anxiety disorders in the CALM study.

Psychological medicine·2014
Same author

Effects of a DASH-like diet containing lean beef on vascular health.

Journal of human hypertension·2014
Same journal

Identifying Robust Longitudinal Transactions Between Loneliness and the Big Five Personality Traits.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

The (Simp)le Truth About Excessive and Obsessive Romantic Behaviors in Men.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

The Robust Quadratic Association Between Resting Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia and Agreeableness: The Evidence From Two Samples in China.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

Ego, Elevation, and Exclusion: Bidirectional Prospective Associations Between Narcissism and Status and Inclusion.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

Life Narratives and the Ten Aspects of the Big Five Across Open-Ended and Targeted Prompts.

Journal of personality·2026
Same journal

Life Stories Matter: The Contribution of Narrative Identity to Personality Functioning and Functional Impairment.

Journal of personality·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a more powerful multiple regression method for analyzing interactions between categorical and continuous variables in personality research, improving upon traditional analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Statistics

Background:

  • Personality research frequently involves theories with interactions between categorical and continuous variables.
  • Traditional analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods are often suboptimal for testing these interaction hypotheses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a more powerful multiple regression approach for analyzing interactions.
  • To offer guidance on structuring regression equations, coding categorical variables, and centering continuous variables.
  • To detail the interpretation of predictor and interaction effects and illustrate graphical displays and post hoc tests.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing multiple regression analysis to model interactions between categorical and continuous variables.
  • Implementing specific coding systems for categorical variables and centering continuous variables.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applying graphical displays and post hoc tests for detailed interpretation of interaction effects.

    • Main Results:

    • The multiple regression approach offers greater statistical power compared to traditional ANOVA adaptations.
    • This method provides protection against spurious conclusions regarding individual predictor impacts in the presence of interactions.
    • Multiple regression can yield all information obtainable from traditional ANOVA procedures, but with enhanced optimality.

    Conclusions:

    • Multiple regression is a superior alternative to ANOVA for testing interaction hypotheses in personality research.
    • Proper structuring of the regression equation, variable coding, and centering are crucial for accurate analysis and interpretation.
    • This approach enhances the validity and interpretability of findings concerning complex variable interactions.