Clinical evaluation of the BacT/Alert and isolator aerobic blood culture systems

The BacT/Alert (BTA) (Organon Teknika, Durham, NC) and Isolator 10 (ISO) (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, NJ) blood culture systems were evaluated for their ability to detect aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms in blood of adult patients. For each culture 8 mL of blood was inoculated into both the aerobic standard BTA bottle and the ISO tube. Of 7,259 paired culture sets, 1,168 organisms were recovered, and 667 (57.1%) of these were considered clinically significant. This represented 540 clinically significant positive cultures from 266 patients. Of the significant isolates, 410 were recovered by both systems, 108 by BTA only and 149 by ISO only (P <.025). Overall, the BTA detected 77.7% of the significant isolates, whereas ISO detected 83.8%. The ISO recovered significantly more isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (P = .0001), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp (P <.01), and non-Enterobacteriaceae gram-negative rod species (P <.0025), whereas the BTA detected significantly more isolates of Streptococcus spp (P <.0025). Growth of S aureus (P <.0025), Enterococcus spp (P <.0025), and Streptococcus spp (P <.0075) was detected earlier by the BTA when laboratory coverage was available during the first shift only (7:30 AM to 4:00 PM), and additionally of Enterobacteriaceae (P <.0005) and other gram-negative rod species (P <.0001) if coverage was extended to 12:00 AM. Yeasts were detected more rapidly by the ISO (P <.0025). The ISO contamination rate (5.9%) was six times that of the BTA. Taking into account its ability to rapidly detect most organisms, its automated and thus labor-saving features, and the minimal contamination rate associated with its use, the BTA appears to be a reliable alternative to the ISO as a blood culturing system, although improvement in detection of staphylococci and non-Enterobacteriaceae gram-negative rods would be desirable.