Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bone-anchored craniofacial prosthesis study

D E Tolman1, P F Taylor

  • 1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|March 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patients with reconstruction of craniofacial or intraoral defects: development of instruments to measure quality of life.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2001
Same author

Maxillary antral-nasal inlay autogenous bone graft reconstruction of compromised maxilla: a 12-year retrospective study.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·1999
Same author

A randomized, multicenter comparison of tacrolimus and cyclosporine immunosuppressive regimens in cardiac transplantation: decreased hyperlipidemia and hypertension with tacrolimus.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·1999
Same author

Surgical-prosthodontic reconstruction of advanced maxillary bone compromise with autogenous onlay block bone grafts and osseointegrated endosseous implants: a 12-year study of 32 consecutive patients.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·1999
Same author

Reconstructing the human face by using the tissue-integrated prosthesis.

Mayo Clinic proceedings·1998
Same author

Fluoroscopy and selective angiography of left ventricular assist system inflow cannula as a method of detecting cannula entrapment.

Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis·1998
Same journal

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Different Types of İmplant- Supported Prostheses: A Retrospective Study.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Soft Tissue Dehiscence and Survival of Customized CAD/CAM Titanium Subperiosteal Implants: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Implants with Cylindrical and Conical Internal Cam-Groove Connections.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Robot-Assisted Zygomatic Implant Placement for Hemimaxillectomy Defect Reconstruction: A Case Series.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

7-mm-Diameter Versus 5-mm-Diameter Immediate Post-Extraction Implants in the Molar Region: 1-Year Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence, the Dunning-Kruger Effect, and Implant Treatment Planning.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
See all related articles

Titanium implants for craniofacial prostheses show high success rates. This bone-anchored system offers a viable alternative to surgery, improving patient quality of life.

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Biomaterials Engineering
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Craniofacial prostheses are essential for patients with defects.
  • Conventional retention systems can be uncomfortable and unstable.
  • Osseointegrated implants offer a potentially superior solution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the long-term osseointegration survival rate of titanium implants supporting craniofacial prostheses.
  • To assess the long-term retention and stability of these bone-anchored prostheses.
  • To compare this method with traditional reconstructive surgery.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective study involving 24 centers and 145 patients.
  • Placement of 452 titanium implants for auricular, orbital, or nasal prostheses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Follow-up of 115 patients for at least 30 months.

    • Main Results:

    • An overall implant survival rate of 96% (19 out of 452 implants lost).
    • Demonstrated long-term retention and stability of the craniofacial prostheses.
    • Patients reported significant improvements in quality of life.

    Conclusions:

    • Bone-anchored craniofacial prosthesis systems are a viable alternative to conventional surgery.
    • This approach offers improved quality of life compared to older support systems.
    • High implant survival rates support the efficacy of this reconstructive method.