Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Grasping a fruit: selection for action

U Castiello1

  • 1Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Bologna, Italy.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|June 1, 1996
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impulsive brain: Neural underpinnings of binge eating behavior in normal-weight adults.

Appetite·2019
Same author

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and working memory: a task switching paradigm.

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2006
Same author

Improving left hemispatial neglect using virtual reality.

Neurology·2004
Same author

Effects of left parietal injury on covert orienting of attention.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2002
Same author

Perceiving an entire object and grasping only half of it.

Neuropsychologia·2001
Same author

The effects of abrupt onset of 2-D and 3-D distractors on prehension movements.

Perception & psychophysics·2001
Same journal

Human thermal sensitivity drifts at extreme temperatures.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Dynamic competition between selective attention and spatial prediction during visual search.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Encapsulation of the visual perception of social events from semantic priming.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Biasmapping: Idiosyncratic covert search in the vicinity of fixation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

What are you still waiting for? Fricative recognition shows encapsulated processing and is partially predicted by secondary cue reliance.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same journal

Eye movements reveal that drivers can predict the location of hazards in dynamic road scenes but gaze and awareness are dissociable.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
See all related articles

Unconscious information processing was studied using reach-to-grasp movements. Distractor fruits did not affect movement kinematics unless a secondary task involved the distractor, suggesting limited passive processing.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Motor control

Background:

  • Investigating unconscious information processing is crucial for understanding cognitive mechanisms.
  • Reach-to-grasp movements provide a naturalistic task to study action selection.
  • The role of distractors in motor tasks remains an area of active research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine unconscious information processing during reach-to-grasp movements.
  • To determine the influence of distractor stimuli on the kinematics of object manipulation.
  • To differentiate between automatic and controlled processing of task-irrelevant information.

Main Methods:

  • Kinematic analysis of upper limb reach-to-grasp movements using the ELITE system.
  • Nine experiments involving various fruits as targets and distractors.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulation of task demands, including subsidiary tasks involving distractors.
  • Main Results:

    • Distinct kinematics were observed for grasping different types of fruit.
    • Distractor fruits did not alter movement kinematics when no subsidiary task was present.
    • Interference effects emerged when participants performed a counting task on illuminated distractor fruits.
    • No interference was observed when grasping a target fruit and counting its illuminations simultaneously.

    Conclusions:

    • Action selection appears to involve minimal passive processing of distractors.
    • Dual-action processing of simultaneous objects can lead to automatic processing of irrelevant distractor properties.
    • These findings contribute to understanding the limits and mechanisms of attentional control in motor tasks.